nks,
Dimitry
-Original Message-
From: Morris Kwan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 07:14
To: Voytenko, Dimitry
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
Hi, Dimitry
I might not fully understand all of your points. I believe that yo
To:
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
data.com>Subject: RE: xslt/xpath
function extension mechanism
eve this can be solved pretty easily. If not anything
else, I added createXObject() method to ExtCallContext, where result objects
can be adjusted.
Thanks,
Dimitry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 11:28
To: [EMAIL PRO
Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function
extension mechanism
Hi,
Here's what I have to say about changes I proposed earlier. Sorry for the
delay, I meant to finish much earlier, but got really jammed at work.
It is pretty much finished. There's just some cleaning that should be done
to finalize this as I had to comment some of the code which could be simpl
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
Hi, Dimitry --
I have your stuff. However, I'm just swamped with what's going on at work.
I hope to be able to look at it over the weekend.
Knowing your usual thoroughness, I expect that I won't hav
essage-
> From: Voytenko, Dimitry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:38 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: 'Gary L Peskin'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
>
>
> Hi,
>
al Message-
From: Voytenko, Dimitry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 16:27
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: 'Gary L Peskin'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
Hi,
I'm sorry for the length of the letter a
Sorry, have to resend this in two portions, b/c Apache's mail server doesn't
accept, files bigger than 100,000
_
Sector Data, LLC, is not affiliated with Sector, Inc., or SIAC
xpath_ext_01_27.2.zip
Description: Binary data
Sorry, have to resend this in two portions, b/c Apache's mail server doesn't
accept, files bigger than 100,000
_
Sector Data, LLC, is not affiliated with Sector, Inc., or SIAC
xpath_ext_01_27.1.zip
Description: Binary data
Hi,
I'm sorry for the length of the letter and some material that may look
excessive. But I thought that someone might want to comments on this.
Basically I'm looking for the answers to the following questions:
1. If any of these points have already been discussed and declined, I'd like
to know w
3 12:33
To: 'Voytenko, Dimitry'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
Hi, Dimitry --
I think that, in general, the changes you propose sound good. It seems to
me that this will generalize the lookup mechanism to handle a variety of
URIs and break
; -Original Message-
> From: Voytenko, Dimitry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:14 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
>
>
hanks,
Dimitry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
I don't understand all the points in your note, but I agre
anks,
Dmitry E. Voytenko
Software Engineer
Sector Data, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 07:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
I think the current extension
ExtPackage pkg);
}
Thanks,
Dmitry E. Voytenko
Software Engineer
Sector Data, LLC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 07:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xslt/xpath function extension mechanism
I th
>I've got a question concerning current extension mechanism (the one
>using Java reflection). Is it considered finished?
I don't know that an open source project would support the concept of
"finished"!
Your mention of porting between Xalan-C++ and Xalan-Java is probably
interesting enough to
I think the current extension mechanism is closed to finished. There is no
major item in our development plan right now. Of course you are free to
propose any enhancements to it. If users like to see those enhancements, we
can put them into our plan. You can also contribute any enhancements
yourse
18 matches
Mail list logo
