Is there a simple way to turn off the cacheing at the API level for testing
purposes so I can see if the memory problems go away? At least I would know
if that was the problem or not and could go from there.
Chris
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On Friday, 11/16/2001 at 10:11 C
On Friday, 11/16/2001 at 10:11 CET, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> be possible to have the PI extended also to the case of
> document() in head position inside the select of a xsl:copy-of?
We know we need a general answer to the question of DTM cache control --
preferably
On Thursday, 11/15/2001 at 04:52 MST, "Chris McCabe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If we load the
> same documents over and over, would we see increasing memory
> consumption, or does it reuse the cached version?
It's supposed to reuse. But if you're having memory use problems, we should
check th
> If you're using document() heavily, there are some known issues regarding
> whether/when/how-long a DTM is retained in memory. There's a PI that can be
> used as a workaround in the common case of an with a
> document()-based expression in its select, but a general and automated
> answer is sti
We do use document() from 1-3 times with every transformation, but there
are only a handful of unique documents that get loaded. The total of
all documents loaded is less than 1 Meg of text XML. If we load the
same documents over and over, would we see increasing memory
consumption, or does
If you're using document() heavily, there are some known issues regarding
whether/when/how-long a DTM is retained in memory. There's a PI that can be
used as a workaround in the common case of an with a
document()-based expression in its select, but a general and automated
answer is still being
Does anyone have any data on memory usage for Xalan 2.2 compared to 2.1?
We have found that 2.2 is consuming a great deal more memory than 2.1,
to a point that it brings our server to its knees. Xalan 2.1 runs fine
and under a moderate load we are consuming a total of around 150-200 Meg
of me
