On 04/12/2010 03:25 AM, Henry Zongaro wrote:
Hi, David.
Thanks for your responses. I just had one point on which I wanted to
get clarification. I asked:
> 1. What is the form of the input accepted by PsychoPath? Is it
> restricted to taking a DOM (Level 2?) input tree - whose nodes might
Hi, David.
Thanks for your responses. I just had one point on which I wanted to get
clarification. I asked:
> 1. What is the form of the input accepted by PsychoPath? Is it
> restricted to taking a DOM (Level 2?) input tree - whose nodes might
> implement the ItemPSVI interface of the Xerces
--
> ustbcoder
> ----------
> *发件人：* David Carver
> *发送时间：* 2010-04-11 21:40:21
> *收件人：* ustbcoder
> *抄送：* xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
> *主题：* Re: implement XPath 2.0 function for xalan
> If there is not functionality you need, then I would HIG
eriment merging job :-)
Regards
Xunlong Gui
2010-04-11
ustbcoder
*发件人：* Henry Zongaro
*发送时间：* 2010-04-11 20:47:00
*收件人：* xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
*抄送：* David Carver
*主题：* Re: implement XPath 2.0 function for
Answers in line.
Thanks for your thoughts. I've spent a few minutes looking at some of
the PsychoPath documentation, and I have a few questions and comments:
1. What is the form of the input accepted by PsychoPath? Is it
restricted to taking a DOM (Level 2?) input tree - whose nodes might
Gui
2010-04-11
ustbcoder
*发件人：* Henry Zongaro
*发送时间：* 2010-04-11 20:47:00
*收件人：* xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
*抄送：* David Carver
*主题：* Re: implement XPath 2.0 function for xalan
Hi, Jesper.
Jesper Møller wrote on 04/01/2
org.apache.xpath package replacing
solution for Xalan is feasible, in fact, i have done some experiment merging
job :-)
Regards
Xunlong Gui
2010-04-11
ustbcoder
发件人： Henry Zongaro
发送时间： 2010-04-11 20:47:00
收件人： xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
抄送： David Carver
主题： Re: implement XPath 2.0 function
Hi, Jesper.
Jesper Møller wrote on 04/01/2010 06:24:49 PM:
> I'm one of the committers on PsychoPath XPath 2 engine and would
> like to offer my input where I can help if this is a viable way.
>
> First off, I must confess that while I know XSLT pretty well, I've
> not studied Xalan-J in depth
Hi Jesper,
Welcome here first!
As you said, one day if PsychoPath supplies a decent API which can satisfy
the requirement of both Xalan and Xerces, it will be very easy for Xalan to
consume PsychoPath.
But as you know, Xalan is known as a XSLT engine, support XSLT 2.0 is very
important,necessary
> 1) PsychoPath is not "streamy" yet
Nor is Xalan, really. We have some ability to do deferred loading of the
document, but real streaming is one of those "always wanted, never got
around to" projects. It's a _big_ challenge.
> 2) Type informations is not part of current interfaces.
True. One
-- Original Message ----
> Subject: Re: Re: implement XPath 2.0 function for xalan
> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 08:39:20 +0800
> From: ustbcoder
> Reply-To: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
> To: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org ,
> xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
>
>
> Hi
>
> Y
up much.
Gui Xun Long
2010-03-28
ustbcoder
发件人： David Carver
发送时间： 2010-03-27 12:42:41
收件人： xalan-dev@xml.apache.org
抄送：
主题： Re: implement XPath 2.0 function for xalan
You guys may be able to speed some of this up by leveraging the PsychoPath
XPath 2.0 processor that is at
--
> ustbcoder
>
> *发件人：* Michael Ludwig
> *发送时间：* 2010-03-27 04:39:44
> *收件人：* xalan-j-us...@xml.apache.org
> *抄送：*
> *主题：* Re: Re: implement XPath 2.0 function for xalan
> xunlong gui schrieb am 26.03.2010 um 23:27:1
人： Michael Ludwig
发送时间： 2010-03-27 04:39:44
收件人： xalan-j-us...@xml.apache.org
抄送：
主题： Re: Re: implement XPath 2.0 function for xalan
xunlong gui schrieb am 26.03.2010 um 23:27:15 (+0800):
> 1.implements all the XSLT 2.0 functions which do not need sequences
> and XSLT 2.0 schema suppo
Hi henry,
With your instructions,i know how to apply to be a Xalan committer,thank you
:-)
About the Xalan's XSLT 2.0 implemention project, i know it is really a very
huge project, as Michael said, it will even take a developer years to
complete it correctly. So, it is impossible for me to hold t
Hello.
xunlong gui wrote on 03/26/2010 03:51:37 AM:
> You suggest me to make the XSLT 2.0-related contributions gradually,
> function by function, that would make it easier to discuss, evaluate
> and integrate those contributions.
>
> Yeah, i am just doing it,these days,i was coding with Xalan
16 matches
Mail list logo
