> "Joseph" == Joseph Kesselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But it would give you the ability to write first class functions.
Joseph> If you think it's really that important, contact the W3C's
Joseph> XSLT working group and see whether they agree it should go
Joseph> into future ver
Title: RE: Call template with variable name
>>But it would give you the ability to write first class functions.
>If you think it's really that important, contact the W3C's XSLT
>working group and see whether they agree it should go into future
>versions of the langu
>But it would give you the ability to write first class functions.
If you think it's really that important, contact the W3C's XSLT working group and see whether they agree it should go into future versions of the language. (Actually, check the XSLT 2.0 specs first; they might have anticipated thi
> "Joseph" == Joseph Kesselman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm looking for a way to call a template with a variable name or
>> mode.
Joseph> According to the XSLT spec, the values of those attributes
Joseph> are not Attribute Value Templates -- they're literal
Joseph> QNames. Hen
> I'm looking for a way to call a template with a variable name or mode.
According to the XSLT spec, the values of those attributes are not Attribute Value Templates -- they're literal QNames. Hence, variable substitution or other _expression_ evaluation are not available.
Your best best seems
