Encryption over the internet should be all but trivial to implement -
and fully legal (in the US at least) as well.
However, any and all of that traffic would have to be blocked from going
out any I-gate - somehow. In order to go out on RF, it would first have
to be decrypted and then transmit
--- Tom Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If list members have old-format GNIS files that are
> not already in the pub/GNIS
> directory, they should probably bzip2 them and
> upload them to aprs.tamu.edu
> in the 'incoming' directory, then notify Gerry that
> they're there and can be
> moved. Ple
It's only permissible when remote controlling a Satellite.
Andreas, N6NU
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 10:11 -0800, Greg Eigsti wrote:
> Isn't encrypted data over RF a big no-no? For the everyday ham type
> anyway...
>
> Greg
>
> On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Jim Tolbert wrote:
>
> > Hi, all
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 12:49:48PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> I've used it before, although not recently. Not sure when it broke, but
> doesn't seem to work now. It says that it connects to geonames.usgs.gov and
> then it says
Isn't encrypted data over RF a big no-no? For the everyday ham type
anyway...
Greg
On Nov 9, 2007, at 10:06 AM, Jim Tolbert wrote:
Hi, all.
As the capabilities of Xastir are explored in our corner of the
world, one query was raised in discussion. Is there anyway, or
more
Hi, all.
As the capabilities of Xastir are explored in our corner of the world,
one query was raised in discussion. Is there anyway, or more to the
point, what would be required, to have GPS location packets encrypted?
The thought was related to the secure use of Xastir in tacti
I've used it before, although not recently. Not sure when it broke,
but doesn't seem to work now. It says that it connects to
geonames.usgs.gov and then it says HTTP request sent, but the reply
is 404 not found. It has that same sequence for both
http://geonames.usgs.gov/stategaz/CT
