On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 06:15:04PM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
On 6/29/07, Richard Polivka, N6NKO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will send the -v from gcc and the output from both runs under a
separate email. I don't think that
I need this confirmed.
I did a Fedora 7 install on BigBox. Brought in the requisite routines to
work with 1.9.1.
configure / make / crash on CoverSplit issue.
Found -Lrtree -lrtree in command line that cause the crash.
Edited out -lrtree in configure file.
Make clean / configure / make /
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:40:09AM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
I need this confirmed.
I did a Fedora 7 install on BigBox. Brought in the requisite routines to
work with 1.9.1.
configure / make / crash on CoverSplit
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:07:25AM -0600, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:40:09AM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
I need this confirmed.
I did a
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Tom Russo wrote:
You should never need to edit the configure file. You can disable rtree
with the --without-rtree. Editing out the link should cause problems,
because WITH_RTREE would still be defined.
I still don't understand the reported link failure when rtree is
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Tom Russo wrote:
On another note, Fedora is completely dropping OpenMotif because its license
is considered incompatible with Fedora's, so Fedora users will
no longer have access so some of the dialog box tricks that Xastir plays.
Just to be clear, it's not a trick.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:49:21AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Tom Russo wrote:
On another note, Fedora is completely dropping OpenMotif because its license
is considered incompatible with Fedora's, so
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Tom Russo wrote:
There's
probably a different way to go about it so that we don't have bugs to work
around.
Yes. Destroy the dialog and build it from scratch, then display the
new one. Ugly.
Then again, maybe we should get started on Xastir 2 so we don't use Motif
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Tom Russo wrote:
On another note, Fedora is completely dropping OpenMotif because its license
is considered incompatible with Fedora's, so Fedora users will
no longer have access so some of the dialog box tricks that Xastir
Tom,
All I did was remove the one library search, not both. If the library
was not available, linking should have failed due to an undefined
reference call.
The executable does run on my system as I have compiled it.
What I will do is compile 1.9.0 straight and capture the whole process
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:
All I did was remove the one library search, not both. If the library
was not available, linking should have failed due to an undefined
reference call.
And the library should be available, 'cuz it's part of Xastir.
A possibility is that
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Curt, WE7U wrote:
It may be hard to find, as in a string inside a compiled library.
A google search for CoverSplit -xastir library found something in
GRASS and of course R-Tree. Perhaps there's a library that GRASS
uses that we also may use which has R-Tree in it?
Then
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:
It may have been covered but with no conclusion. I have to take a bunch
of tree trimmings to the dump, so while I am doing that, I will have
BigBox do an exhaustive search to see if there are multiple instances of
CoverSplit.
It may be hard
Curt,
It may have been covered but with no conclusion. I have to take a bunch
of tree trimmings to the dump, so while I am doing that, I will have
BigBox do an exhaustive search to see if there are multiple instances of
CoverSplit.
73 from 807,
Richard, N6NKO
Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Fri, 29
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:33:13PM -0500, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
Tom,
All I did was remove the one library search, not both. If the library was
not available, linking should have failed due to an undefined reference
call.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:55:11AM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Curt, WE7U wrote:
It may be hard to find, as in a string inside a compiled library.
A google search for CoverSplit -xastir library found
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Tom Russo wrote:
One could always try changing the name CoverSplit throughout the split_l.*
files to something else (like l_CoverSplit). There was a brief period where
I had been confused and was suggesting to folks that they try changing
CoverSplit in a different pair
Gents,
There is no need to start a religious war over editing ./configure. I am
trying to understand what is going on.
I want to try a couple of items first before the CVS release.
It appears that using either -lrtree -Lrtree or -Lrtree -lrtree does
not make a difference, It still faults
On 6/29/07, Richard Polivka, N6NKO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will send the -v from gcc and the output from both runs under a
separate email. I don't think that there is a problem with xastir. I am
beginning to believe that there is an issue between the -l and the -L
calls in gcc.
Those 2
19 matches
Mail list logo
