Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-27 Thread Jason Winningham
On Nov 27, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Steve Friis wrote: So, can I suggest 14580:m/100 ? I don't recall what the m filter does, but the default should _not_ be anything that depends on the successful transmission of a packet to the IS to result in a data flow back to xastir. Hmm, come to think o

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-27 Thread Steve Friis
Chuck Byam wrote: On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 12:03 +, John Ronan wrote: Just wondering, why does xastir default to port 10151 as the Internet Server port that it connects to? This primarily done for historical reasons and because nobody has really discussed changing it. -- Chuck S

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-27 Thread Gerry Creager
And, just to respond to my own e-mail... it died sometime last night after I sent this. Still looking at traces. gerry Gerry Creager N5JXS wrote: Finally got a cvs update today and have an LSB test running right now. (./configure --with-lsb). Config'd, make'd and executed fine on a hybrid F

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-27 Thread Chuck Byam
On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 12:03 +, John Ronan wrote: > Just wondering, why does xastir default to port 10151 as the Internet > Server port that it connects to? This primarily done for historical reasons and because nobody has really discussed changing it. -- Chuck _

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-27 Thread Curt, WE7U
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, John Ronan wrote: > Tested on a Ubuntu-6.06-LTS > > Have quite a few "XPM and/or ImageMagick support have not been > compiled in." Messages. Those should be because you have selected some maps that require one or the other. Deselect those and you shouldn't see them anymore.

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-27 Thread John Ronan
Ok, Tested on a Ubuntu-6.06-LTS Have quite a few "XPM and/or ImageMagick support have not been compiled in." Messages. For clarity it might be worth putting a "\n" after the fullstop. Just wondering, why does xastir default to port 10151 as the Internet Server port that it connects to?

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-27 Thread Curt Mills
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Gerry Creager N5JXS wrote: > Finally got a cvs update today and have an LSB test running right now. > (./configure --with-lsb). Config'd, make'd and executed fine on a hybrid > FC4/CentOS 4.5 system. Unfortunately that flag isn't the entire thing you need by any means. I po

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-26 Thread Gerry Creager N5JXS
Finally got a cvs update today and have an LSB test running right now. (./configure --with-lsb). Config'd, make'd and executed fine on a hybrid FC4/CentOS 4.5 system. gerry Curt Mills wrote: On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, John Ronan wrote: haven't really got a chance to... I'll have a better look t

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-26 Thread John Ronan
On 26 Nov 2006, at 20:08, Curt Mills wrote: On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, John Ronan wrote: haven't really got a chance to... I'll have a better look tomorrow morning. I tried it on two machines but it didn't work strace ./xastir execve("./xastir", ["./xastir"], [/* 15 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No s

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-26 Thread Curt Mills
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, John Ronan wrote: > haven't really got a chance to... I'll have a better look tomorrow morning. I > tried it on two machines but it didn't work > > strace ./xastir > execve("./xastir", ["./xastir"], [/* 15 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > dup(2)

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-26 Thread Curt Mills
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Dalen Kruse wrote: > I tried this and it's running with no problems on my system (Mandriva > 2006). I get a message warning me that ImageMagick isn't compiled in, > but I'm assuming that's by design at this point. Yea. I have Shapelib(Internal) compiled in, but nothing else

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-26 Thread Dalen Kruse
I tried this and it's running with no problems on my system (Mandriva 2006). I get a message warning me that ImageMagick isn't compiled in, but I'm assuming that's by design at this point. BTW, the LSB packages on Mandriva 2006 are LSB 3.0 compliant. Dalen KC0OVU On Sat, 2006-11-25 at 22:14

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-26 Thread John Ronan
Has anyone tried this yet? I realize that it's Thanksgiving break but that's just in the U.S. I figured somebody would be daring enough to try it! Sorry Curt, haven't really got a chance to... I'll have a better look tomorrow morning. I tried it on two machines but it didn't work strace .

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-25 Thread Curt Mills
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Curt Mills wrote: > Those of you with LSB-3.0 or 3.1 compliant Linux systems may want to > try a new binary package for Xastir. It's at: > > ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/a/archer/aprs/xastir/LSB/xastir-lsb.bz2 > > If you care to download it and try it, decompress it at the root

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-24 Thread Curt Mills
On Fri, 24 Nov 2006, Jeremy Utley wrote: > Curt, if you can give me the command lines used for building, I'll > write you up a basic RPM spec file to help out - I've got some decent > experience building RPM's for my job, whipping one out for you won't > be a major thing. I'd do the build myself,

Re: [Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-24 Thread Jeremy Utley
Curt, if you can give me the command lines used for building, I'll write you up a basic RPM spec file to help out - I've got some decent experience building RPM's for my job, whipping one out for you won't be a major thing. I'd do the build myself, but I'm not sure if FC6 is lsb-compliant enough.

[Xastir] Linux Standard Base Test

2006-11-24 Thread Curt Mills
Those of you with LSB-3.0 or 3.1 compliant Linux systems may want to try a new binary package for Xastir. It's at: ftp://ftp.eskimo.com/u/a/archer/aprs/xastir/LSB/xastir-lsb.bz2 If you care to download it and try it, decompress it at the root level so that it will create the /opt/lsb-xastir/