Re: [VOTE] xbean 3.6 3rd try

+1 Joe David Jencks wrote: I've prepared a 3rd release candidate for xbean 3.6: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-007/ Site staged at: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/xbean/3.6/ It looks like we fixed 13 issues for 3.6: https://issues.

Re: [VOTE] xbean 3.6

+1 - looks good to me. Joe David Jencks wrote: I've prepared a release candidate for xbean 3.6: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/geronimo-staging-053/ Site staged at: http://people.apache.org/~djencks/staging-site/maven/xbean/3.6/ It looks like we fixed 11 issues for 3.6:

[RESULT][VOTE] Release XBean 3.5 - rc2

The vote passes with 5 +1 and no other votes. I'll get to work getting the binaries pushed out. As usual, it will take a little while for the images to get synced to the mirrors. Thanks! Joe Joe Bohn wrote: I uploaded a second distribution of XBean 3.5 which should include the N

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.5 - rc2

Thank you to those that already voted. It would be nice to get one or two more folks to review the release. If there are no more comments I'll plan to close the vote tomorrow, 1/30. Thanks, Joe Joe Bohn wrote: I uploaded a second distribution of XBean 3.5 which should include the N

[VOTE] Release XBean 3.5 - rc2

I uploaded a second distribution of XBean 3.5 which should include the NOTICE/LICENSE files in all the appropriate places (I hope). The same changes are present in this candidate that were present in the last one: * SocketAddress factory example for Alex [1] * XBEAN-111 Only register Conv

Re: [VOTE] Release XBean 3.5 - CANCELLED

It looks like the javadoc jars don't include the necessary LICENSE and NOTICE files. I'll figure out how to get them included and create a new release candidate. Any other comments? Thanks, Joe Joe Bohn wrote: > > I've uploaded a distribution of Xbean 3.5 which i

[VOTE] Release XBean 3.5

I've uploaded a distribution of Xbean 3.5 which includes the following changes: * SocketAddress factory example for Alex [1] * XBEAN-111 Only register Converters with the VM when requested [2] * Make dependencies optional [3] * XBEAN-114 generify xbean-naming [4] * XBEAN-115 Fix rebind

Re: xbean 3.5 release?

What is the status of the asm shading issue? Can we pursue a release yet? Thanks, Joe Jacek Laskowski wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: >> >> So can somebody push a release for 3.5? Are there active issues that >> need to >> be resolve

Re: xbean 3.5 release?

Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Joe Bohn wrote: >> >> As many of you already know from the Geronimo dev list - we're looking to >> release Geronimo 2.2 by mid January. However, we need a number of >> snapshots >> released prior to that and xBean trunk (3.5-SNAPSH

Re: [VOTE] Publish Genesis 1.0 to m2 central

[+0] Um, I don't have an opinion Joe Jason Dillon wrote: This weekend I cleaned up Genesis and made an initial release of 1.0 to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository. In order to release other projects, like specs, xbean, gbuild, gshell, javamail and server... we need to have genesis 1.0 publi