I'll be at SC, also interested in joining in person or virtually.
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023, 4:16 PM Imam Toufique wrote:
> Hi Don,
>
> I am very interested joining virtually via zoom. I would love to see xcat
> move forward very much. Please count me in .
>
> Thanks
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at
Hi Don,
I am very interested joining virtually via zoom. I would love to see xcat
move forward very much. Please count me in .
Thanks
On Sat, Sep 30, 2023 at 1:28 PM Don Avart wrote:
> Kurt,
> Glad to hear you are interested in getting together at SC. Hopefully
> there will be others
Kurt,
Glad to hear you are interested in getting together at SC. Hopefully there
will be others interested in joining, if not in person at least virtually
through a zoom. With respect to continued support for xCAT I’ve had numerous
conversations about the possibility of keeping xCAT alive and
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 05:56:26PM -0400, Don Avart wrote:
> All,
> Would there be interest in an unofficial “birds of a feather” type meeting
> for xCAT at SC23 to discuss the future of xCAT? I may be able to line up a
> conference room for folks attending to get together. If there’s interest
Jarrod,
I would like to set up a call with you, for a demonstration , and
understanding how the tool works. You mentioned you are on the east coast,
Let me know what would work for you for the coming weeks.
If anyone else is interested, I can put a zoom link in this thread so
others can join.
On the confluent document, that collection is it. When it comes to
documentation, we are a bit challenged trying to find the right way to glue it
all together for a good flow, for arbitrary users. In addition to demos and
discussion, I may spend a bit more time on video tutorials at the
Dear (remaining) List-Members,
* First of all many thanks to Mark Gurevich, Peter Wong, Nathan Besaw and
all contributors not mentioned explicitly for the xCAT tool and their great
work.
My questions are:
* It’s seems to me that there’s no one (company, consortium, group of sw
