:41 AM
To: xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [xcat-user] Toward a post-sourceforge future
Hi,
Another option would be to host packages on github (if xcat.org isn't fast
enough). GitHub allows binary hosting.
I wouldn't recommend going back to sourceforge. The recent develop
, Frank Hammer, Thorsten MoehringSitz der Gesellschaft: EhningenRegistergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 17122
- Original message -From: Guang Cheng Li To: xCAT Users Mailing list Cc:Subject: Re: [xcat-user] Toward a post-sourceforge futureDate: Thu, Jul 23, 2015 5:25 AM
We discussed
Software Park,
No.8, Dong Bei Wang West Road, Haidian District Beijing 100193,
PRC
北京市海淀区东北旺西路8号中关村软件园28号楼
邮编: 100193
From: Jarrod Johnson
To: "xCAT Users Mailing list (xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net)"
Date: 2015/07/22 21:46
Subject: [xcat-user
So this is my take on how things are/should proceed.
First, as soon as possible the primary git repositories will shift to github.
This has already happened for confluent. I think this is a pretty unambiguous
move. It aligns with a good community contribution, and in the (hopefully
unlikely)
