up *should* be fair game, but oh well.
Russell Jones
---11/05/2013 05:35:44 PM---I've poked at this box some
more, and it seems like this is the main reason for the
issues. It does
From: Russell Jones
To:
xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 11/05/2013 05:35 PM
Subject: Re: [xcat-user] bmcsetup and
Supermicro X9DRT
I've poked at this box some more, and
it seems like this is the main reason for the issues. It doesn't
To: xcat-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: 11/05/2013 05:35 PM
Subject:Re: [xcat-user] bmcsetup and Supermicro X9DRT
I've poked at this box some more, and it seems like this is the main reason
for the issues. It doesn't want to let the ADMIN user be overwritten.
Thoughts?
has another limitation, we can probably adapt bmcsetup
easily enough.
Russell Jones
---11/01/2013 04:41:11 PM---Hi all, We have a Supermicro
X9DRT-based node that we are attempting to use
From: Russell Jones
To: xCAT Users Mailing
adapt bmcsetup easily
enough.
Russell Jones
---11/01/2013 04:41:11 PM---Hi all, We have a Supermicro
X9DRT-based node that we are attempting to use
From: Russell Jones
To: xCAT Users Mailing list
Da
e were some IPMI implementations that mandated we use slot 2. If
supermicro has another limitation, we can probably adapt bmcsetup easily
enough.
From: Russell Jones
To: xCAT Users Mailing list
Date: 11/01/2013 04:41 PM
Subject:[xcat-user] bmcsetup and Supermicro X9DRT
Hi all,
Hi all,
We have a Supermicro X9DRT-based node that we are attempting to use
bmcsetup on. We are running into an issue where bmcsetup on this
Supermicro seems to be adding users with a default to "disabled" state.
I have to specifically run "ipmitool user enable " on the node to
enable the user
