Re: [xcat-user] remote network definition (Russell Jones)

2014-02-07 Thread Russell Jones
Strange, that's all I use to define remote network blocks and it works fine. The subnet {} definition gets created, but is not tied into a real shared-network {} block. A commented out shared-network block is created like so for remote networks, I'm assuming for internal xcat use: #shared-networ

Re: [xcat-user] remote network definition (Russell Jones)

2014-02-07 Thread Brown, David M JR
> > http://xcat.sourceforge.net/man5/networks.5.html > > **mgtifname** > >The interface name of the management/service node facing this >network. !remote! indicates a non-local network for relay DHCP. > > >"!remote!" is what you want to use be able to define networks that are not >local

Re: [xcat-user] remote network definition

2014-02-06 Thread Russell Jones
http://xcat.sourceforge.net/man5/networks.5.html **mgtifname** The interface name of the management/service node facing this network. !remote! indicates a non-local network for relay DHCP. "!remote!" is what you want to use be able to define networks that are not local to the node.

[xcat-user] remote network definition

2014-02-06 Thread Brown, David M JR
I was wondering what the '!remote!' network is supposed to mean in the networks table. It seems like xCAT just defines it internally and doesn't use it for much. I'd like to know how to define a network that I'd like xCAT to manage that isn't directly attached to the xCAT master node. All dhcp