On Wednesday 08 February 2006 11:09, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Debian we have desktop-profiles [1] which runs an Xsession.d script that
manages the contents of the XDG_*_DIRS variables (and similar variables
such as KDEDIRS, or CHOICESPATH).
When setting the variables it parses
Kevin Krammer wrote:
Unfortunately there is no standard way to add additional prefixes,
autopackage
suffers from this as well
Yes. But there is a nearly distribution-wide way to use /etc/profile.d
(Gentoo has also /etc/env.d).
As far as I understand an installer cannot even rely on
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 18:18, Jeremy White wrote:
rather pragmatic approach so if it was up to me to implement xdg
support into loki-setup I'd just try to put a desktop file into
/usr/share/applications if it already exists. If that fails, try
$XDG_DATA_DIRS and finally create
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:56:54 -0800, Waldo Bastian wrote:
If there is concensus that that is the right long term direction and that the
benefits outweigh the disadvantages then I guess we should go that way. I
would like to hear some more cheers of support for that direction first
though.
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 11:56, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 11:32, Kevin Krammer wrote:
On Wednesday 08 February 2006 11:09, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
On Debian we have desktop-profiles [1] which runs an Xsession.d script
that manages the
If there is concensus that that is the right long term direction and that the
benefits outweigh the disadvantages then I guess we should go that way. I
would like to hear some more cheers of support for that direction first
though.
You can consider this another -1 vote.
IMHO, the current
Do the X people hang out on this mailing list? If not, where all do they
hang out? fd.o seemed to indicate that xdg was the center of action for
everything...
Aaron
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 05:45 -0800, Aaron Stone wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-03 at 10:20 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Feb 02,
