Re: all-in-desktop

2006-04-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
Benjamin Rich wrote: But we are still left with this pointless separation. Why not have one place only for applications, and one place for a user's files? We had this discussion in a KDE mailing list a few years ago and I remember it was quite heated. There was a strong resistance to making the

Re: all-in-desktop

2006-04-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
Benjamin Rich wrote: We ended up concluding that $HOME and Desktop are two different things. But why should they be? Home is where everything I have is. Desktop is where stuff I am working on is. This is the simple analogy to the physical objects. Besides, as I said, we have had this

Re: all-in-desktop

2006-04-06 Thread Bernd Schwendele
Benjamin Rich schrieb: What is the point of saving files to the desktop so they're easily accessible; but then having to move them into the home directory? 2x organisation for the user, wasting time they could be spending actually using their files. Well, if I am looking onto my desk at home

RE: all-in-desktop

2006-04-06 Thread Bastian, Waldo
[Johnathan: This is a great example that highlights why I think we should be defining interfaces for integration tasks (Like Portland does) instead of writing a specification that is more proscribing how a desktop environment should implement certain functionality (e.g. where files should be