This paragraph:
The lookup inside a theme is done in three phases. First all the
directories are scanned for an exact match, e.g. one where the allowed
size of the icon files match what was looked up. Then all the
directories are scanned for any icon that matches the name. If that
fails we fi
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 21:21 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> > The problem, Holger, is that if the org.freedesktop.PowerManager service
> > is on the system bus, it's awkward and backwards to interact with the
> > desktop session using notifications and dialogs. It's not impossible,
> > just pretty awk
On Thu 01. Jun - 15:05:18, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 20:44 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> > > To interact with the session we need this to be session context rather
> > > than system context. Plus with David's work, the distinction between
> > > session and system will be a lot sma
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 15:05 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 20:44 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> > > To interact with the session we need this to be session context rather
> > > than system context. Plus with David's work, the distinction between
> > > session and system will be a
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 20:44 +0200, Holger Macht wrote:
> > To interact with the session we need this to be session context rather
> > than system context. Plus with David's work, the distinction between
> > session and system will be a lot smaller. For powersaved, any session
> > program can just p
On Thu 01. Jun - 19:31:36, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 20:10 +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Le jeudi 1 juin 2006 00:01, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> > > Okay, my first post to this list, so I hope I'm aiming in the right
> > > direction.
> > >
> > > gnome power manager :
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 11:03 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> Does the current dbuslib implementation allow you to specify what to do
> when the dbus connection gets dropped? If not, then I think that should
> be added.
Yes. Use dbus_connection_set_exit_on_disconnect (DBusConnection*).
David
_
Hi Kevin!
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 20:10 +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Le jeudi 1 juin 2006 00:01, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> > Okay, my first post to this list, so I hope I'm aiming in the right
> > direction.
> >
> > gnome power manager : org.gnome.PowerManager
> > gnome screensaver
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 20:10 +0200, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Le jeudi 1 juin 2006 00:01, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> > Okay, my first post to this list, so I hope I'm aiming in the right
> > direction.
> >
> > gnome power manager : org.gnome.PowerManager
> > gnome screensaver :
Le jeudi 1 juin 2006 00:01, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> Okay, my first post to this list, so I hope I'm aiming in the right
> direction.
>
> gnome power manager : org.gnome.PowerManager
> gnome screensaver : org.gnome.ScreenSaver
>
> This should probably be cross desktop and less g
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> I think this fits in really nice with the long-term vision that
> Portland
> has with DAPI (Deskop API). I would like to suggest to rename the
> interface org.gnome.* to org.freedesktop.* and host them as part of
> DAPI in the Portland CVS
>Next to that, care should be taken when using dbus in
security-sensitive
>applications, like a screensaver -> the always returning "abort when
bus
>crashes" issue. You cant allow a screensaver to abort at any time,
>certainly not because of some external service.
Does the current dbuslib implemen
Hi Waldo,
Bastian, Waldo wrote:
The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
"Poke" method?
The Poke method is a way to simulate user input. It is the programmatic
equivalent to moving the mouse back and forth or hitting the Shift key
or something. If the screensaver
Hi David,
David Zeuthen wrote:
[snip]
I think I only have one comment on the current spec:
Name: Inhibit
Args: DBUS_TYPE_STRING "application-name"
DBUS_TYPE_STRING "reason for inhibit"
Returns:INT cookie
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:01 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Okay, my first post to this list, so I hope I'm aiming in the right
> direction.
>
> gnome power manager : org.gnome.PowerManager
> gnome screensaver : org.gnome.ScreenSaver
>
> This should probably be cross desktop and
On wo, 2006-05-31 at 23:01 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> The interfaces we have now are attached.
/me still thinking about a standard dbus interface definition format...
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> Richard
___
xdg mailing list
xdg@lists.freedesktop.
On do, 2006-06-01 at 12:54 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If the app crashes, then we get a bus disconnect from the :foo name,
> which we can automatically remove any lock(s) for the application.
> This
> is already done in g-p-m and g-s CVS.
Hmm, lots of this is what I wanted to do with CDIS :s
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 10:07 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
> Hi Waldo,
>
> Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> > The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
> > "Poke" method?
>
> The Poke method is a way to simulate user input. It is the programmatic
> equivalent to moving the mo
Hi David,
David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 10:07 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote:
Hi Waldo,
Bastian, Waldo wrote:
The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
"Poke" method?
The Poke method is a way to simulate user input. It is the programmatic
equivale
Hi Rodrigo,
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
"Poke" method?
I guess it can be used by apps like video players to prevent the
screensaver to fire while showing the movie.
It is p
On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 12:08 +0200, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:
> Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Rodrigo Moya wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> >>
> >>> The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
> >>> "Poke" method?
> >>>
> >>
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
> "Poke" method?
If the screensaver is running then it simulates user activity and shows
the unlock box. We call this in gnome-power-manager to show the unlock
box automat
Thiago Macieira wrote:
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
"Poke" method?
I guess it can be used by apps like video players to prevent the
screensaver to fire while showin
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
>On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
>> The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
>> "Poke" method?
>
>I guess it can be used by apps like video players to prevent the
>screensaver to fire while showing the movie.
It should be enoug
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 23:01 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> The GNOME Screensaver DBUS API
> --
...
> Name: setActive
> Args: DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN state
> state: TRUE to request activation,
>
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 17:48 -0700, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> The screensaver interface looks good. What is the use case for the
> "Poke" method?
>
I guess it can be used by apps like video players to prevent the
screensaver to fire while showing the movie.
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
26 matches
Mail list logo
