Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Pierre Wieser
> What specification are you referring to? > In case of DES-EMA (http://www.nautilus-actions.org/?q=node/377), I > don't think that's deprecated. In fact, nautilus-actions still > exists, even if it's not in the default package set. Humm.. Yes, I do confirm: Nautilus-Actions still exists ;) And no

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Jannis Pohlmann
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:03:08 +0100 Giovanni Campagna wrote: > Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 17.56 +, Jannis Pohlmann ha > scritto: > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:43:17 + > > Peter Brett wrote: > >> [...] > > > > > > It would be nice to avoid a repeat of the controversy that > > > happened

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Jannis Pohlmann
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:03:08 +0100 Giovanni Campagna wrote: > Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 17.56 +, Jannis Pohlmann ha > scritto: > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:43:17 + > > Peter Brett wrote: > >> [...] > > > > > > It would be nice to avoid a repeat of the controversy that > > > happened

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Giovanni Campagna
Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 17.56 +, Jannis Pohlmann ha scritto: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:43:17 + > Peter Brett wrote: >> [...] > > > > It would be nice to avoid a repeat of the controversy that happened > > earlier this year w.r.t. libappindicator/StatusNotifier and GNOME, > > and I t

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Giovanni Campagna
Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 17.43 +, Peter Brett ha scritto: > Giovanni Campagna writes: > > > Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 16.44 +, Peter Brett ha scritto: > > [...] > > It would be nice to avoid a repeat of the controversy that happened > earlier this year w.r.t. libappindicator/S

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Jannis Pohlmann
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:43:17 + Peter Brett wrote: > Giovanni Campagna writes: > > > Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 16.44 +, Peter Brett ha scritto: > >> > >> Could you please compare and contrast your proposed approach with > >> the way KDE 4 implements this kind of functionality? > > >

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Peter Brett
Giovanni Campagna writes: > Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 16.44 +, Peter Brett ha scritto: >> >> Could you please compare and contrast your proposed approach with the >> way KDE 4 implements this kind of functionality? > > I didn't know KDE 4 implemented this, and therefore have no knowledge

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Giovanni Campagna
Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 16.44 +, Peter Brett ha scritto: > Giovanni Campagna writes: > > > As part of GNOME 3.4, we expect to provide the applications with the > > ability to install custom actions within their own app launcher. > > This is something Unity has done since the first rele

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Peter Brett
Giovanni Campagna writes: > As part of GNOME 3.4, we expect to provide the applications with the > ability to install custom actions within their own app launcher. > This is something Unity has done since the first release, therefore I > think it would be useful to agree on a common format, so th

Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Giovanni Campagna
As part of GNOME 3.4, we expect to provide the applications with the ability to install custom actions within their own app launcher. This is something Unity has done since the first release, therefore I think it would be useful to agree on a common format, so that multiple environments could benef