Re: Fwd: why not XDG_PREFIX_HOME

2017-09-15 Thread Marc Boocha
Okay I do agree that breaking change, so I think XDG_CONFIG_HOME/XDG_CACHE_HOME can remained unchanged, also all dirs can have their directories after realization of the fact. I think we could instead as rhkramer said, all default new directories added to the relative to an another variable call XD

Re: Fwd: why not XDG_PREFIX_HOME

2017-09-15 Thread rhkramer
On Friday, September 15, 2017 07:45:14 AM Johannes Löthberg wrote: > Hey, > > Quoting Marc Boocha (2017-08-30 10:37:44) > > > Instead having an XDG_BIN_HOME, XDG_CONFIG_HOME, XDG_DATA_HOME, we should > > have a single XDG_PREFIX_HOME. This will be located as ~/.local. I don't agree with the pro

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] basedir: Add XDG_BIN_HOME

2017-09-15 Thread Johannes Löthberg
Quoting Lennart Poettering (2017-08-30 10:23:06) > Looks fine to me too. IIRC I have commit access to the git repo, hence > I might commit this eventually (ping me in two weeks about this if > nobody else took care of this yet). However, before that happens I > think we should wait for more replies

Re: Fwd: why not XDG_PREFIX_HOME

2017-09-15 Thread Johannes Löthberg
Hey, Quoting Marc Boocha (2017-08-30 10:37:44) > Instead having an XDG_BIN_HOME, XDG_CONFIG_HOME, XDG_DATA_HOME, we should have > a single XDG_PREFIX_HOME. This will be located as ~/.local. Since make install > or package manger normal produce these directories, have separate > environmental > va