On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:03:08 +0100
Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 17.56 +0000, Jannis Pohlmann ha
> scritto:
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:43:17 +
> > Peter Brett wrote:
> >> [...]
> > >
> > > It would be nice to avoid a
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:03:08 +0100
Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 17.56 +0000, Jannis Pohlmann ha
> scritto:
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:43:17 +
> > Peter Brett wrote:
> >> [...]
> > >
> > > It would be nice to avoid a
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:43:17 +
Peter Brett wrote:
> Giovanni Campagna writes:
>
> > Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 16.44 +, Peter Brett ha scritto:
> >>
> >> Could you please compare and contrast your proposed approach with
> >> the way KDE 4 implements this kind of functionality?
> >
>
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 02:07:11 -0500
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 03:06 +0300, Aleksei Lissitsin wrote:
>
> > Was there any update/agreement on the issue?
>
> Yes on the agreement. And sorry! I totally forgot to post an update
> about this to the list.
>
> This is the
On Fri, 20 May 2011 22:57:57 +0200
Stef Bon wrote:
> 2011/5/20 Jannis Pohlmann :
> > On Fri, 20 May 2011 22:30:21 +0200
> > Stef Bon wrote:
> >
> >> 2011/5/20 Kevin Krammer :
> >> > On Friday, 2011-05-20, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> >> >
On Fri, 20 May 2011 22:30:21 +0200
Stef Bon wrote:
> 2011/5/20 Kevin Krammer :
> > On Friday, 2011-05-20, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> >
> >> Ummm, which preferences? For example, xdg-open does some
> >> heuristics to determine which desktop environment is running, and
> >> then it just calls
On Fri, 20 May 2011 22:11:51 +0200
Křištof Želechovski wrote:
> Dnia piątek, 20 maja 2011 o 19:14:57 Jannis Pohlmann napisał(a):
>
> > Note that if someone calls "Thunar file://bar/foo.txt", the file
> > "/bar/foo.txt" is opened in the user's favor
Hey,
On Fri, 20 May 2011 11:12:56 -0500
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> We can certainly standardize on the UI operations. What should we use
> for the name - org.freedesktop.FileManager1 ? (numbered for further
> additions)
Sounds fine to me.
> I just threw this together quickly; haven't va
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 00:05:05 +0100 (CET)
Pierre Wieser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my small application, desktop actions are supposed to be displayed
> depending of the mimetype of files currently selected in the
> file-manager.
>
> I am able to find the mimetype of the file, but I feel it is not
> eno
Hey,
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:32:56 +0200
Ryan Lortie wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've implemented what I believe to be a generally useful DBus
> protocol. Currently this protocol is implemented in glib using the
> interface name org.gtk.Actions. I'd like to use the
> org.freedesktop.Actions interface name
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:53:32 +0100
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Why would we want the master git repo to be hosted on gitorious? fd.o
> already provides the ability to host git repos...
Is there any useful documentation on who is responsible for the
repository administration and granting commit permi
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 19:11:31 +0200
Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 07 September 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > Marco Martin wrote:
> > > On Monday 07 September 2009, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I am probably a bit late at this, but thought I would ask anyway.
> > >>
> > >> Wh
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:25:25 +0200
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 16:14 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:58:17 +0200
> > Alexander Larsson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:13 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> &
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:58:17 +0200
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 14:13 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
>
> > (Personally, I'd like to propose to merge all the failed/
> > subdirectories into a single directory -- failed/ -- because IMHO
> > the f
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 10:55:52 +0200
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-07 at 12:24 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > Dear xdg list,
> >
> > I originally wrote this email to Jens Finke and Olivier Sessink
> > (CC), since both of them wrote the freedesktop.org thumbnail spec.
> > However,
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:12:01 +0200
Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:24:04 +0200
> Didier Roche wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Alexander
> > Larsson wrote:
> > > Where does this leave us? One possible solution would be to tag
> &
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:24:04 +0200
Didier Roche wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Alexander Larsson
> wrote:
> > Where does this leave us? One possible solution would be to tag each
> > application with a set of desktops that is was "designed" for
> > (DesignedFor=KDE). I.e. it would be
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:54:03 +0200
David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 16 August 2009, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote:
> > As it currently stands nautilus has one way of adding an entry to
> > the right-click menu and konqueror has another (and I'm not sure
> > about other file managers). I believe it would
On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:02:43 +0200
David Faure wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 August 2009, Didier Roche wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Right now, GNU/Linux distributions (Debian, Ubuntu, from what I see
> > it seems to apply to Fedora, OpenSuse and Mandrake as well…) use a
> > static defaults.list fi
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 20:40:25 +0200
Luca Ferretti wrote:
> 2009/8/2 Albert Astals Cid :
> >
> > As i said, the problem is that trying to use the two keys to create
> > a third one is wrong and software that does that should be fixed
> > not to.
>
> [cut]
>
> > The question is, do we REALLY need a
On Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:12:49 +0200
Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Sunday 12 July 2009 16:56:51 Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> >
> > We establish one or two persons per project as general
> > freedesktop.org contacts. Whether they are part of the release team
> > or not i
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:31:27 +0200
Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Le Friday 10 July 2009, Jannis Pohlmann a écrit :
>
> > Does it really matter who the contact points are? As Aaron said, if
> > two persons from the same project disagree, then there's something
> > wrong.
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 09:42:43 +0200
Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Friday 10 July 2009 01:38:45 Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> >
> > Release teams ... I still don't agree with that ;)
>
> The rationale for having the release teams as the point of contact is
> t
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 22:19:59 +0200
Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> Following up on the discussion about freedesktop.org at GCDS and the
> additional input on the mailing list, I wrote down a specification
> for the process how to manage freedesktop.org specifications. It's
> based on the consensus
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:32:52 +0200
Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Friday 10 July 2009 00:10:55 Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:58:43 +0200
> > Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> > >
> > > That said, it doesn't mean at all that only specs re
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 09:58:43 +0200
Cornelius Schumacher wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2009 01:52:32 Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> >
> > The main problem I still see with this approach is that it doesn't
> > really answer the question when to grant a specification the fd.o
>
Hey,
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 22:00:09 +0200
Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We had a small discussion involving few KDE, Gnome, and freedesktop
> fellow at Gran Canaria desktop summit.
>
> I'm trying there to summarize, correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> We agreed that freedesktop would have a wiki pag
On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:49:30 +0200
Julien Danjou wrote:
> At 1246038223 time_t, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > moreover, this is something nobody has been taking on, so there is
> > no prior or competing effort. if there had been, i would have
> > joined up with that some time ago.
> >
> > this is qu
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 03:53:11 +0200
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 01:44 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> > On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 02:24 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 07.06.2009, 16:28 +0100 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
> >
> > > > Yes, but we'd still be
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:44:05 +0100
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > I only mentioned Thunar as an example, because it's usage of the fdo
> > specs for the "send to" menu IMO is very clean and simple.
>
> You still haven't explained what Thunar does that nautilus-sendto (or
> nautilus) would benefit fro
Hey,
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:17:43 -0600
"Aaron J. Seigo" wrote:
> however, it only has value if people use it, to state the absolutely
> obvious. i stopped pushing this forward shortly after my last attempt
> to get it going due to the complete lack of interest shown by people
> on this list. i g
On Tue, 19 May 2009 10:15:07 +0200
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 01:30 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:01:27 +0200
> > Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 18 May 2009 13:48:08 +0200
>
> [CUT]
>
>
On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:01:27 +0200
Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009 13:48:08 +0200
> Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 04:00 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> >
> > > In theory, this should completely hide how thumbnails are stored.
On Mon, 18 May 2009 13:48:08 +0200
Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 04:00 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
>
> > In theory, this should completely hide how thumbnails are stored.
> > For instance, it doesn't really matter whether a cache is used or
> >
On Fri, 15 May 2009 12:34:17 +0200
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 04:00 +0200, Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
>
> > I think we should improve the description of Unqueue a little bit.
> > Unqueue doesn't really prevent service-side implementations of
> &g
On Fri, 15 May 2009 04:00:22 +0200
Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> The main purpose of the org.freedestop.thumbnailer.Generic interface
> is to provide methods for requesting thumbnails for files. In addition
> it gives applications control over the request processing (e.g. via
> the Queue
Hey,
this mail is intended to sum up the chat I had with Philip today and to
maybe get some feedback on my/our thoughts ... and maybe even get a
discussion started! (ZOMG!)
If anyone is not familiar with the spec, you can read it on
http://live.gnome.org/ThumbnailerSpec. It's implemented as a ser
On Tue, 12 May 2009 17:40:48 -0400
Rodney Dawes wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 23:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Sat, 02.05.09 16:14, Lennart Poettering (mz...@0pointer.de)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 21.04.09 01:41, Lennart Poettering (mz...@0pointer.de)
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Fri, 8 May 2009 00:05:40 +0200
Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> [2]
> http://git.xfce.org/jannis/libxfce4menu/tree/?branch=parser-rewrite
Err, it's
http://git.xfce.org/jannis/libxfce4menu/tree/?h=parser-rewrite
actually.
- Jannis
signature.asc
Description: PG
Hey all,
I'm kind of stuck in a library naming problem right now. I'm working on
an implementation of the XDG menu specification. For a while this
project had the name "libxfce4menu" but with a recent API redesign and
reimplementation came interest from others to use it in e.g. Alacarte.
Of course
Hi there,
sorry to bother you again, but I found another bug in the menu test
suite and updated my list of bugs today:
http://lunar-linux.org/~jannis/menu-spec-testsuite.txt
1) and 2) have not been fixed yet, 3) is new.
Regards,
Jannis
pgpbrlzIhwtRE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I have prepared a list of possible bugs in the test suite I noticed
today. Would someone (Waldo?) please comment them?
You can find this list on (the testing output would have made this
eMail unreadable, so I uploaded it to our server):
http://lunar-linux.org/~jannis/menu-spec-testsuite.txt
Th
On Mon, 05 Feb 2007 09:23:51 -0500, dan sinclair wrote:
> Jannis Pohlmann wrote:
> > I tried to run the submenu-collision test, which failed with the
> > following (slightly simplified) diff:
> >
> > --- /tmp/menutestdir/run-result.filtered
> > +++ /tmp/m
Hey,
I've been playing a lot with the menu spec test suite today.
First of all, here's another bug report (missing result file again):
!!! Result file (tests/DirectoryDir/result) for tests/DirectoryDir
missing
I tried to run the submenu-collision test, which failed with the
following (sligh
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:10:41 -0800, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> I have commited a set of changes to the menu-spec test suite. The
> changes were done in preparation of including the menu-spec in LSB.
While testing the new Xfce menu implementation, I got this:
!!! Result file (tests/AppDir/result)
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007 11:10:41 -0800, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> I have commited a set of changes to the menu-spec test suite. The
> changes were done in preparation of including the menu-spec in LSB.
Attached is a patch which fixes a typo in default_interpret_results().
The result "OK (different orde
Hi all,
I'm an Xfce developer and I'm working on a menu spec implementation for
it at the moment. The most important parts of the specification are
already done and now I started to work on loading legacy menus.
The spec says: Create a menu for each legacy directory, set its
to the directory pat
47 matches
Mail list logo
