On 23 June 2016 at 19:54, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 23/06/16 17:53, Allison Lortie wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016, at 13:24, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> On the other hand, what we are doing here very much might break the
>> previously working behaviour of making symlinks from
>> /usr/share/applicat
On 17 January 2016 at 17:49, Ken Taylor wrote:
> On 01/17/2016 10:05 AM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
> Thanks rhkramer,
>
> I appreciate the vote of confidence. Perhaps "separate X screens" is
> something which only a small percentage of user are multi-tasking enough to
> take advantage of. How
On 16 January 2016 at 23:18, Ken Taylor wrote:
> On 01/16/2016 01:31 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ken and all,
>>
>>> I appreciate all of the input folks are providing. However, I asked the
>>> simple question if separate X screens could be configured on Intel
>>> integrated graphics. The
On 15 January 2016 at 23:46, Ken Taylor wrote:
> On 01/15/2016 10:56 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>>
>> There are other ways of getting multi-monitor support other than using
>> two separate X screens. The most recent and modern way is XRandR. So
>> instead of epoxying your monitor port, or using
On 20 November 2015 at 22:01, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> Currently, the security model of Linux systems is "distro verifies
> security and adds to their own repo", with, of course, the step of
> "user trusts distro".
>
> The security model of Batis seems to be "user trusts application developer"
>
On 2 November 2015 at 17:56, Norman Goldstein wrote:
> XDG is installed on my fedora22 x86-64 desktop. I was unable to reliably
> run a 3rd party screen saver until I wrote a utility to automatically
> suspend the xdg screens saver. Basically, the util
> 1. Creates an X window
> 2. Calls xdg-s
Lennart Poettering 0pointer.de> writes:
>
> On Thu, 09.01.14 13:08, Ryan Lortie (desrt desrt.ca) wrote:
>
> > It's a whole other issue, though, when we start to talk about
> > independent app vendors who don't want to use Gtk. People who want to
> > make something in SDL and have it just wor
On 21 January 2014 08:09, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 12:23 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> there is some problem with the archives so I can't read the whole
>> thread about this.
>>
>> From the existing API I can see th
Hello,
there is some problem with the archives so I can't read the whole
thread about this.
>From the existing API I can see three things that are inhibited
- screen blank/lock
- system sleep (STR/hibernation)
- system shutdown
- logoff/user switch
and two ways to inhibit
- timeout - the opera
