[RFC] X-Content-Rating key for .desktop files.

2011-12-03 Thread Peter Brett
ternative to having an "Adult" XDG menu category. Peter [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xdg/12788 [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xdg/12753/focus=12783 -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre __

Re: desktop-entry-spec: Add an optional Keywords key

2011-12-02 Thread Peter Brett
Vincent Untz writes: > Le vendredi 02 décembre 2011, à 13:53 +0100, Florian Müllner a écrit : >> On vie, 2011-12-02 at 12:43 +, Simon McVittie wrote: >> > On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 at 12:35:09 +, Peter Brett wrote: >> > > I just checked -- the Trinity DE (forked

Re: desktop-entry-spec: Add an optional Keywords key

2011-12-02 Thread Peter Brett
n these days of almost-ubiquitous UTF-8, the "best practice" for these kind of problems is invariably to specify a particular single-byte codepoint as a field separator. The fact that there's a translation bug in the TDE example is neither here nor there, IMHO.

Re: desktop-entry-spec: Add an optional Keywords key

2011-12-02 Thread Peter Brett
Florian Müllner writes: > On jue, 2011-12-01 at 19:21 +0000, Peter Brett wrote: > Other than that, I found another issue: > > "For historical reasons KDE is using some KDE-specific extensions that > are currently not prefixed by a X-KDE- prefix. > > - KDE specific k

Re: desktop-entry-spec: Add an optional Keywords key

2011-12-01 Thread Peter Brett
wonder to what extent it'll be abused by upstream developers cramming in any and every even vaguely related keyword, though. Peter -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre ___ xdg mailing l

Re: desktop-entry-spec: Add an optional Keywords key

2011-12-01 Thread Peter Brett
field that you could share with us, as a starting point? Regards, Peter -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre ___ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Peter Brett
Giovanni Campagna writes: > Il giorno gio, 24/11/2011 alle 16.44 +0000, Peter Brett ha scritto: >> >> Could you please compare and contrast your proposed approach with the >> way KDE 4 implements this kind of functionality? > > I didn't know KDE 4 impleme

Re: Extending the Desktop Entry spec for static app actions

2011-11-24 Thread Peter Brett
n format, so that multiple > environments could benefit from this feature. Could you please compare and contrast your proposed approach with the way KDE 4 implements this kind of functionality? Regards, Peter -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Gro

Re: [RFC] Fixing the Desktop Menu Specification.

2011-11-23 Thread Peter Brett
tional comments or raised any objections, could you please go ahead and push my patches? Thanks, Peter -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre ___ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://

Re: RFC: An app category for "adult" material?

2011-11-21 Thread Peter Brett
mantically, and seems to me to be an attempt to misuse the .desktop file Categories field in an inappropriate way. Is it possible to back this change out? Peter -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre

Re: [RFC] Fixing the Desktop Menu Specification.

2011-11-16 Thread Peter Brett
:-) It's a bit hard to maintain my righteous fury at the unhelpfulness of freedesktop.org specification maintainers when they go around being all reasonable at me... Peter ;-) -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Research Group Surrey Space Centre _

Re: [RFC] Fixing the Desktop Menu Specification.

2011-11-14 Thread Peter Brett
Vincent Untz writes: > [snip] > > Le jeudi 10 novembre 2011, à 16:58 +0000, Peter Brett a écrit : >> > This means adding icons, translations, etc. for all categories, but also >> > having inconsistent menus between computers, and worse, having apps that >> &g

Re: [RFC] Fixing the Desktop Menu Specification.

2011-11-10 Thread Peter Brett
Vincent Untz writes: > Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011, à 16:54 +0000, Peter Brett a écrit : >> >> * Add some language that requires desktop environments to display >> .desktop files that don't include a Main Category but that would >> otherwise be displayed.

Re: [RFC] Fixing the Desktop Menu Specification.

2011-11-09 Thread Peter Brett
ssumed by the specification to form a complete ontology, but they don't. Here's an idea: instead of having separate Main Categories and Additional Categories, why not simply have a list of Suggested Categories and a recommended algorithm for determining which ones to display, based on

Re: Request to register a "Main" desktop Category: Electronics

2009-11-01 Thread Peter Brett
pment" categories, which is clearly the Wrong Thing. I can't believe that, after all these years, XDG *still* hasn't managed to correct this obvious deficiency in the original set of main categories. Peter -- Peter Brett Remote Sensing Researc