As I was one of the original authors of the notifications spec,
somebody pointed me to the recent discussions on xdg-list about it.
When Christian and myself wrote this spec, it was to solve a problem
the Linux desktop had: the only poptart implementation was KDE
specific and so most of the apps
Mike Hearn wrote:
5 years on, I just wanted to say that I am in awe at how much time has
been wasted discussing the *name* of the *interface* of the
*notifications system*.
You're missing the point. The much larger issue is the viability of
fd.o itself (not the idea, but the actual current
Le Friday 26 June 2009, Mike Hearn a écrit :
As I was one of the original authors of the notifications spec,
somebody pointed me to the recent discussions on xdg-list about it.
When Christian and myself wrote this spec, it was to solve a problem
the Linux desktop had: the only poptart
On Friday 26 June 2009, Mike Hearn wrote:
When Christian and myself wrote this spec, it was to solve a problem
the Linux desktop had: the only poptart implementation was KDE
specific and so most of the apps we used or worked on (like Gaim and
Wine) did not use them. The point of freedesktop
On Friday 26 June 2009 06:47:08 Mike Hearn wrote:
5 years on, I just wanted to say that I am in awe at how much time has
been wasted discussing the *name* of the *interface* of the
*notifications system*.
Aaron has already replied but no one has brought up a question yet which I've
been
