On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Andrea Francia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/7/4 David Faure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> > This is all pretty bad, and the current solution to this in both KDE4
>> > and gnome (gio) is that trash to FAT/NTFS partitions is not allowed.
>
> Help me to solve this eni
2008/7/4 David Faure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > This is all pretty bad, and the current solution to this in both KDE4
> > and gnome (gio) is that trash to FAT/NTFS partitions is not allowed.
Help me to solve this enigma, the GNOME support or not the Trash Spec?
In which version?
I understand that
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> There are some issues with using the trash spec on FAT and NTFS systems.
> These filesystems don't support storing UIDs, nor does it support the
> sticky bit. Instead, the way they are generally mounted in a writable
> way under unix is:
>
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:29 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
>
>>> This is all pretty bad, and the current solution to this in both KDE4
>>> and gnome (gio) is that trash to FAT/NTFS partitions is not allowed.
>> Why is this a big deal? For FAT/NTFS partitions we can as
Seems i didn't send this reply to the list.
Forwarded Message
From: Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brian J. Tarricone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:02:32 +0100
On Wed, 2008-02-
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> There are some issues with using the trash spec on FAT and NTFS systems.
> These filesystems don't support storing UIDs, nor does it support the
> sticky bit. Instead, the way they are generally mounted in a writable
> way under unix is:
>
> a) All files are owned by the
There are some issues with using the trash spec on FAT and NTFS systems.
These filesystems don't support storing UIDs, nor does it support the
sticky bit. Instead, the way they are generally mounted in a writable
way under unix is:
a) All files are owned by the user mounting the filesystem
b) All