Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec

2008-07-04 Thread A. Walton
On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Andrea Francia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/7/4 David Faure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> > This is all pretty bad, and the current solution to this in both KDE4 >> > and gnome (gio) is that trash to FAT/NTFS partitions is not allowed. > > Help me to solve this eni

Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec

2008-07-04 Thread Andrea Francia
2008/7/4 David Faure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This is all pretty bad, and the current solution to this in both KDE4 > > and gnome (gio) is that trash to FAT/NTFS partitions is not allowed. Help me to solve this enigma, the GNOME support or not the Trash Spec? In which version? I understand that

Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec

2008-07-04 Thread David Faure
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Alexander Larsson wrote: > There are some issues with using the trash spec on FAT and NTFS systems. > These filesystems don't support storing UIDs, nor does it support the > sticky bit. Instead, the way they are generally mounted in a writable > way under unix is: >

Re: [Fwd: Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec]

2008-02-07 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 10:29 -0800, Brian J. Tarricone wrote: > >>> This is all pretty bad, and the current solution to this in both KDE4 >>> and gnome (gio) is that trash to FAT/NTFS partitions is not allowed. >> Why is this a big deal? For FAT/NTFS partitions we can as

[Fwd: Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec]

2008-02-07 Thread Alexander Larsson
Seems i didn't send this reply to the list. Forwarded Message From: Alexander Larsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Brian J. Tarricone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:02:32 +0100 On Wed, 2008-02-

Re: shared trash directories in the trash spec

2008-02-06 Thread Brian J. Tarricone
Alexander Larsson wrote: > There are some issues with using the trash spec on FAT and NTFS systems. > These filesystems don't support storing UIDs, nor does it support the > sticky bit. Instead, the way they are generally mounted in a writable > way under unix is: > > a) All files are owned by the

shared trash directories in the trash spec

2008-02-06 Thread Alexander Larsson
There are some issues with using the trash spec on FAT and NTFS systems. These filesystems don't support storing UIDs, nor does it support the sticky bit. Instead, the way they are generally mounted in a writable way under unix is: a) All files are owned by the user mounting the filesystem b) All