hey,
I was just going to do feature request #453663
(http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=453663&group_id=31602&atid=402707)
-
add support for nested src elements. The request basically asks that
xdoclet behaves similar to the javac task, which leads me to the point
that the
Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> > > Postponed EJBDoclet Bugs/Features:
> > > 5- [ #444503 ] Support more than one servlet per class
> >
> > Skip this one. Too obscure to be relevant.
>
> I agree its obscure, and agree it can be put off for now...
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> > Postponed EJBDoclet Bugs/Features:
> > 5- [ #444503 ] Support more than one servlet per class
>
> Skip this one. Too obscure to be relevant.
I agree its obscure, and agree it can be put off for now... but I just
today came across the same
Hey
I'm going through the XDoclet code, and I'm noticing that the Javadoc is
really absent overall in the code. That is bad in general, but very bad
for an OpenSource project that's supposed to be extensible. After 1.0
the code really does need a makeover comment-wise. It will make it more
useful
A couple of comments.
Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Postponed EJBDoclet Bugs/Features:
> 5- [ #444503 ] Support more than one servlet per class
Skip this one. Too obscure to be relevant.
> 6- [ #438613 ] Support for Business interface pattern
Because...? It's been debated before, and it's not really
Hi!
(Ara, can you please change the mailing list to have the list as
reply-to. The setting for this is in the mailman config)
Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Anyway, if your stuff is stable then commit it for v1.0 and v1.0 will
> get even richer :-)
Heh, not even started, but it should be fairly trivia
A wise old hermit known only as Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once
said:
> hey guys,
>
> I was porting something at work to use today's build and noticed a
> couple of things:
>
> we now need @ejb:create-method on stateless session beans... any reason
> for this? why dont we do how we
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> This evening I will try the latest CVS and post my results (local
> interfaces, without CMP 2.0).
I haven't actually tried using the local interface yet, but have done
everything up to that point (including deploy with local interfaces) and
all is g
This evening I will try the latest CVS and post my results (local interfaces,
without CMP 2.0).
In the meantime -- do you guys have any idea how to map a custom JDBC type
to Jboss CMP?
I'm using PostgreSQL, with it's proprietary types "point" and "circle". Their
JDBC driver implements objects
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> Am I correct, that my build.xml "ejbspec" needs to be "2.0", while my
> cmp-version in my bean classes needs to be "1.x"? And should this all
> work on Jboss 2.4 final?
yep. the problem you experienced boils down to defaults really. Last
night
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> I forgot that ActionForm is a class, what a dumb design :-)
(o: yep - I looked for the interface, it certainly aint there!
> We can apply adapter pattern for this case. I mostly use dataobjects in
> my jsp taglibs, even as rows in my listing views, als
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Another thing that I want to note regarding this is ejb:bean and
> isOfType. What we do right now for ejbeans is just check for the class
> type and if it's ab ejbean then generate the corresponding element in
> xml files. Now what if you declare a bean
Here is a list of the things that we need to complete for v1.0. If you
implement one of these items, then put the item number in your cvs log
when committing, so that I know which one is done/undone. Also if you
want to subscribe (!) for implementing it then reply to this email and
put your name i
Feature Requests item #456468, was opened at 2001-08-29 03:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402707&aid=456468&group_id=31602
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Stevens (stevensa)
>Assigned to: Konstantin Priblu
Bugs item #456126, was opened at 2001-08-28 06:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=456126&group_id=31602
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Stevens (stevensa)
>Assigned to: Konstantin P
Hi,
Some minor changes, fixes, completing some other stuff (websphere,
latest polishes to ejb-deployment-descruptor, home/localhome.j needs
some fixes, updating weblogic task to use ejb:bean and other new tags),
docs and things like that. I'll recheck it today and prepare a list of
the undone thi
> we now need @ejb:create-method on stateless session beans... any
reason
> for this? why dont we do how we use to, just have the ejbCreate
method in
> the generated session, and call super if its there (with exceptions
clause
> as well)...
Yeah, for session beans it's ok without the @ejb:create
> > The case is really similar to dataobjects. In fact I think it's more
> > correct to generate an ActionForm by deriving it from the generated
> > dataobject.
>
> you mean generate an ActionForm class that extends the ABCData
> class? afaik action types must extend the struts Action class, so
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/resources/xdoclet/ejb
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv25977/resources/xdoclet/ejb
Modified Files:
relationships.j
Log Message:
applied Joel Boehland's patch for some relationships problems
___
Xdoc
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/ejb
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv25977/src/xdoclet/ejb
Modified Files:
AbstractEjbSubTask.java
Log Message:
applied Joel Boehland's patch for some relationships problems
___
Xdoclet-
ejbspec 2.0 , cmp 1.x . try this and deploy it. If it does not work let
us know. Still working out the kinks integrating 1.x and 2.x
Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
>
>
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Jboss 2.4 only supports ejb 1.1 and bits of 2.0. CMP is only at 1.1,
>> you have to go to rabbit
Dave Smith wrote:
>
>
> Jboss 2.4 only supports ejb 1.1 and bits of 2.0. CMP is only at 1.1,
> you have to go to rabbit hole to get 2.0 CMP support. (right now that
> part is really raw)
>
>
Thanks Dave. What I want, today, is local interfaces. I can do without
CMP 2.0 today. And I want to
Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> I'm having trouble with the latest xdoclet, making CMP beans and
> deploying on jBoss 2.4 (final)
>
> I am getting these messages from the verifier:
>
> [Verifier]
> Bean: mytest/Note
> Section: 9.2.2
> Warning: The entity bean class must not be defined as abs
hey guys,
I was porting something at work to use today's build and noticed a couple
of things:
we now need @ejb:create-method on stateless session beans... any reason
for this? why dont we do how we use to, just have the ejbCreate method in
the generated session, and call super if its there (wi
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/resources/xdoclet/ejb
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv32194/core/resources/xdoclet/ejb
Modified Files:
ejb-body.j entitycmp.j
Log Message:
Fixed implementation of cmp1.1/2.0 split. Was a problem in the situation where
an entity bean exists i
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/ejb
In directory usw-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv32194/core/src/xdoclet/ejb
Modified Files:
AbstractEjbSubTask.java
Log Message:
Fixed implementation of cmp1.1/2.0 split. Was a problem in the situation where
an entity bean exists in ejb2 conf
26 matches
Mail list logo
