>I see you're pretty active with qdox. Good! We'd like to play with you.
>Do you want to play with us?
I want to play! :)
>I don't agree with Rickard:
>http://roller.anthonyeden.com/page/rickard
My reply: http://radio.weblogs.com/0108103/2002/09/26.html#a72
>I saw from your TODO (don't remem
Different files, same place. You know where :-)
Don't worry about the xdoclet-* ones, they're still the same (till someone
answers the couple of questions I had earlier). In the meantime, there's
some new ones there for you to check too:
xjavadoc-bin-1.0-beta1.zip/tgz and xjavadoc-src-1.0-be
User: stevensa
Date: 02/09/27 15:47:48
Modified:.build.xml
Added: .build.properties
Log:
Build proper distribution files instead of just xjavadoc.jar.
Move properties into a separate file.
Eliminate about 1000 javadoc warnings during build of javadocs tar
User: stevensa
Date: 02/09/27 15:44:22
Modified:src/xjavadoc XExecutableMember.java XDoc.java XClass.java
UnknownClass.java SourceSet.java SourceClass.java
Primitive.java MethodImpl.java BinaryClass.java
Log:
Eliminate a bunch of javad
A wise old hermit known only as Andrew Stevens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> Aslak:
> >1) Running ant in samples fails because many properties aren't set.
> > I have committed a build.properties file in samples that solves the
> >problem and updated samples/build.xml
>
> I'll merge this in
A wise old hermit known only as Andrew Stevens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> >2) commons-logging.jar and log4j.jar are required and missing. Putting
> >them in samples/lib fixes it.
>
> I'll make it copy them explicitly into the zip/tgz from /lib as it
> builds it; no sense having a second
A wise old hermit known only as Mathias Bogaert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> Andrew, what is holding up the release of XDoclet 1.2 beta 1?
Now that's odd. I sent a reply to this from my hotmail account this
morning, but it doesn't appear to have reached the list. Anyway, all it
said was
Hi Geeks
I am just working on implementing some spec. that is very tidious. So I thought it
would maybe great if Interface could be generated by XDoclet.
I know this could become a problem when more than one implementation implements this
interface but at least one could drive it.
The develope
Patches item #585103, was opened at 2002-07-22 14:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=585103&group_id=31602
Category: xdoclet
Group: None
>Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marc Breslow (marc2112)
Assigned to: Nobody/
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 06:20:23
Modified:src/java/xgg/templates bean-impl.vm bean.vm
Log:
Better handling of nested implicit elements at arbitrary level. Now
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generation works too!
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +5 -1 xgg/src/java/xgg/templa
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 06:20:23
Modified:src/java/xgg/dtd DTDParser.jj
Log:
Better handling of nested implicit elements at arbitrary level. Now
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generation works too!
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -17 xgg/src/java/xgg/dtd/DTDParser.jj
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 06:20:23
Modified:src/java/xgg Child.java Element.java ElementFactory.java
XggWriter.java
Log:
Better handling of nested implicit elements at arbitrary level. Now
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generation works too!
Revision Changes
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 06:20:23
Modified:src/java/xgg/ant XggTask.java
Log:
Better handling of nested implicit elements at arbitrary level. Now
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generation works too!
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +5 -5 xgg/src/java/xgg/ant/XggTask.java
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 06:20:22
Modified:samples build.xml
Log:
Better handling of nested implicit elements at arbitrary level. Now
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml generation works too!
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +37 -20xgg/samples/build.xml
Index: build.xml
==
User: pathoss
Date: 02/09/27 05:58:47
Modified:xdocs/development design.xml
Log:
Added some things.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +3 -1 xdoclet/xdocs/development/design.xml
Index: design.xml
==
- ejbspec="2.0"
+ ejbspec="1.1"
?? The samples are written for EJB 2.0 IIRC
Mathias
Aslak Helles?y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
User: rinkrank
> Date: 02/09/27 05:08:36
>
> Modified:samples build.xml
> Added: samples build.propert
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 05:23:08
Modified:samples build.xml
Log:
oops, switched back to 2.0.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +1 -1 xdoclet/samples/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 05:08:35
Modified:.project.xml
Log:
Some changes to make the samples in the binary distro happy about required properties
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +1 -1 xdoclet/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/09/27 05:08:36
Modified:samples build.xml
Added: samples build.properties
Log:
Some changes to make the samples in the binary distro happy about required properties
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +4 -1 xdoclet/samples/build.xml
Andrew, what is holding up the release of XDoclet 1.2 beta 1?
Cheers,
Mathias
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Xdoclet-devel mailing
Patches item #585103, was opened at 2002-07-22 20:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=585103&group_id=31602
Category: xdoclet
Group: None
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Marc Breslow (marc2112)
Assigned to: Nobo
Patches item #608443, was opened at 2002-09-12 16:49
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=608443&group_id=31602
Category: xdoclet
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mathieu Peltier (mpeltier)
Assigned to:
22 matches
Mail list logo
