[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xjavadoc/src/xjavadoc XJavaDocRoot.java

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 19:09:52 Removed: src/xjavadoc Tag: XDOCLET_2_0 XJavaDocRoot.java Log: obsolete --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xjavadoc/lib commons-collections-2.0.jar

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 19:05:12 Added: lib Tag: XDOCLET_2_0 commons-collections-2.0.jar Log: New Revision ChangesPath No revision No revision 1.1.2.1 +326 -0xjavadoc/lib/Attic/commons-collections-2.0.

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xjavadoc/src/xjavadoc/codeunit CodeTestCase.java

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 18:56:23 Modified:src/xjavadoc/codeunit Tag: XDOCLET_2_0 CodeTestCase.java Log: Tried to reuse the parser (for optimisation), before I discovered that they need to be pooled. Revision ChangesPath No revision No

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xjavadoc/javacc Java1.2-b.jjt

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 18:56:22 Modified:javacc Tag: XDOCLET_2_0 Java1.2-b.jjt Log: Tried to reuse the parser (for optimisation), before I discovered that they need to be pooled. Revision ChangesPath No revision No rev

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xjavadoc/src/xjavadoc JavaParser.java SimpleNode.java SourceClass.java

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 18:56:23 Modified:src/xjavadoc Tag: XDOCLET_2_0 JavaParser.java SimpleNode.java SourceClass.java Log: Tried to reuse the parser (for optimisation), before I discovered that they need to be pooled. Revision ChangesPath

[Xdoclet-devel] turn on log4j

2002-10-23 Thread John Zhu
Please advise. How to turn on log4j so the messages from "log.debug" could be seen when running root "ant build.xml". The ant will trigger the testing code inside "Sample" directory. The "log4j.properties (attached)" has been put in the "build" dir as following inside Sample/buiild.xml.

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] xjavadoc.jar

2002-10-23 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
+1 infact +1000 (o: - Original Message - From: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 9:08 AM Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] xjavadoc.jar > Any objections if I remove it from CVS? > > I just updated 2 lines in the grammar. -Now I have t

[Xdoclet-devel] xjavadoc.jar

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Hellesøy
Any objections if I remove it from CVS? I just updated 2 lines in the grammar. -Now I have to commit the whole binary too. -And I couldn't, because I had forgotten to update xjavadoc.jar from CVS myself. I totally agree with David that it's bad scm practice to keep it in CVS. Aslak ---

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xdoclet/samples/src/java/test/ejb AccountBean.java

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 15:47:50 Modified:samples/src/java/test/ejb AccountBean.java Log: Fix for XDT-104 (and removed some dead code) Revision ChangesPath 1.9 +13 -5 xdoclet/samples/src/java/test/ejb/AccountBean.java Index: AccountBean.java =

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xdoclet/modules/xdoclet/src/xdoclet/modules/doc TaskdocTagsHandler.java

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 15:47:50 Removed: modules/xdoclet/src/xdoclet/modules/doc TaskdocTagsHandler.java Log: Fix for XDT-104 (and removed some dead code) --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Inf

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xdoclet/modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb/intf InterfaceTagsHandler.java

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 15:47:50 Modified:modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb/intf InterfaceTagsHandler.java Log: Fix for XDT-104 (and removed some dead code) Revision ChangesPath 1.11 +8 -6 xdoclet/modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/module

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xdoclet/modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb/home HomeTagsHandler.java

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 15:47:50 Modified:modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb/home HomeTagsHandler.java Log: Fix for XDT-104 (and removed some dead code) Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +2 -2 xdoclet/modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS update: xjavadoc/javacc Java1.2-b.jjt

2002-10-23 Thread Aslak Helles?y
User: rinkrank Date: 02/10/23 15:38:23 Modified:javacc Java1.2-b.jjt Log: Fix for XJD-6 Revision ChangesPath 1.33 +3 -0 xjavadoc/javacc/Java1.2-b.jjt Index: Java1.2-b.jjt === RCS file: /c

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] FW: [Middlegen-user] RE: db<->code<->uml?

2002-10-23 Thread Matthias Bohlen
Hi Aslak, just my 5 minute email scan before I go to sleep: I agree 100% with you - the conceptual level that UML allows is outstanding. Extending the abstract classes to get a domain model is also a very useful approach. As I explained with my example "courtroom story" a few days ago, there is

[Xdoclet-devel] Re: [Xdoclet-user] xdoclet problems

2002-10-23 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Edward Kenworthy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > OK so I have xdoclet up and running - well until I > hit this: > > ejbdoclet] Running > [ejbdoclet] Generating PK class for 'MailListEJB'. > [ejbdoclet] javadoc: In doclet class > xdoclet.DocletTask$DocletMain, > method start has thrown a