[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Created: (XDT-664) missing several directives in the bea documentation

2003-10-05 Thread legendaryservice
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-664 Here is an overview of the issue:

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.2 Final release?

2003-10-05 Thread Andrew Stevens
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 23:18, Craig Walls wrote: > To clarify my original e-mail...By +0.5, I mean that I'm +1 to release > XDoclet 1.2 as-is if everyone else agrees, but at the same time, I > understand if there's some who would rather clean up some stuff before > releasing. > > In either event, I

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Portlet module

2003-10-05 Thread Andrew Stevens
On Sat, 2003-10-04 at 22:55, Craig Walls wrote: > For those who haven't noticed, a few weeks ago, I checked in a > JSR-168/Portlet module in to generate JSR-168 compliant portlet.xml files. Was there a JIRA issue for it? It's just that if there isn't, there won't be anything about it in the Chang

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xdoclet/modules/jmx/src/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources mlet.xdt,1.4,1.5

2003-10-05 Thread Craig Walls
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/modules/jmx/src/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv11002/modules/jmx/src/xdoclet/modules/jmx/resources Modified Files: mlet.xdt Log Message: Fixed missing > to close out tag. Index: mlet.xdt ===

[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Updated: (XDT-663) Missing '>' in generated mlet file

2003-10-05 Thread legendaryservice
The following issue has been updated: Updater: Craig Walls (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 5:43 PM Comment: Patch to add missing >. Changes: Attachment changed to patch.txt - Fo

[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Created: (XDT-663) Missing '>' in generated mlet file

2003-10-05 Thread legendaryservice
Message: A new issue has been created in JIRA. - View the issue: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=XDT-663 Here is an overview of the issue:

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.2 Final release?

2003-10-05 Thread Craig Walls
To clarify my original e-mail...By +0.5, I mean that I'm +1 to release XDoclet 1.2 as-is if everyone else agrees, but at the same time, I understand if there's some who would rather clean up some stuff before releasing. In either event, I'm definitely +1 that we put a plan in place to make *somet

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.2 Final release?

2003-10-05 Thread Erik Hatcher
I'm +1 on releasing XDoclet as-is - HEAD has been working fine for me for many months. We use but a fraction of XDoclet (EJB, Struts, some custom stuff), but no issues to report at all (otherwise I would have fixed them myself :). Erik On Saturday, October 4, 2003, at 05:50 PM, Craig Walls

[Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xdoclet/xdocs resources.xml,1.26,1.27

2003-10-05 Thread Andrew Stevens
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/xdocs In directory sc8-pr-cvs1:/tmp/cvs-serv16622 Modified Files: resources.xml Log Message: Add CodeGeneration.net interview with Ara. Index: resources.xml === RCS file: /cvsroot/xdoclet/x

[Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Commented: (XDT-660) initialContext.close() in finalizer

2003-10-05 Thread legendaryservice
The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: Grégory Joseph Created: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 4:03 AM Body: seems like you're confusing finally (as in try/catch/finally) and finalize. You should review this one, it's a job-interview classic ;)