Matt:
Just tried this again and didn't have any luck.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:18:56 -0600, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you try putting an @struts.validator tag (w/ no attributes) on the
> parent objects setter? I believe that is the workaround that Erik
> suggested.
>
> Matt
>
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Andrew Stevens
Created: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 7:43 PM
Body:
You can't use
...
as the parser then thinks ${EJBSource} is the root of your package hierarchy. It will
then (silently) skip all the
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv7346
Modified Files:
project.xml
Log Message:
Add another patch contributor.
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdocle
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/modules/exolab/src/META-INF
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv6851/META-INF
Modified Files:
xtags.xml
Log Message:
Add support for verify-constructable attribute (XDT-490). Thanks to Dan Kristensen
for the patch.
Index: xtags.xml
Update of
/cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/modules/exolab/src/xdoclet/modules/exolab/castor/ejb/resources
In directory
sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv6851/xdoclet/modules/exolab/castor/ejb/resources
Modified Files:
mapping-body.xdt
Log Message:
Add support for verify-constructable att
Message:
The following issue has been re-assigned.
Assignee: Andrew Stevens (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
View the issue:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/browse/XDT-490
Here is an overview of the issue:
-
I think I did try that. I'll check it again later tonight.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:18:56 -0600, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you try putting an @struts.validator tag (w/ no attributes) on the
> parent objects setter? I believe that is the workaround that Erik
> suggested.
>
> Ma
Did you try putting an @struts.validator tag (w/ no attributes) on the
parent objects setter? I believe that is the workaround that Erik
suggested.
Matt
On Sep 22, 2004, at 9:53 AM, Nick Heudecker wrote:
Matt,
Putting the validation tags on the nested object's properties creates
validation XM
Matt,
Putting the validation tags on the nested object's properties creates
validation XML, but the properties are not prefixed with the name of
the parent object's property name. So you get this:
Instead of:
+1 for a release and +1 for a few days for Nick to figure this stuff out
below. I believe Erik Hatcher knows how to do it. Currently, I think
you have to put a @struts.validator tag on the setter of the nested
object and then the children will be picked up. If that works, it would
be nice to
Please ignore my stupidity
Original Message --
This doesn't look right - the description is in the mandatory tag?
*** 268,273
form-name
!
! to include this property
in specified form.
Steve.
This doesn't look right - the description
is in the mandatory tag?
*** 268,273
form-name
!
! to include this property
in specified form.
Steve.
Hello,
I added some documentation to the @struts tags, because I think Nicks problem (see
below) originated in missing documentation for the "@struts.dynaform-field" tag (you
can override the generated property name with the "name" attribute of this method
level tag).
I did not open a JIRA iss
Update of /cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/modules/apache/src/META-INF
In directory
sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv20206/xdoclet/modules/apache/src/META-INF
Modified Files:
xtags.xml
Log Message:
added missing documentation for some struts-tags
Index: xtags.xml
===
I would really like to be able to have the Struts validator code
validate nested properties for the 1.2.2 release. If anyone has
suggestions about how to accomplish this, please let me know. Here's
the original email:
http://www.mail-archive.com/xdoclet-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg16038.htm
Hi folks,
+ 1 from me, too.
Cheers,
René
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Heiko W. Rupp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. September 2004 09:13
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];
16 matches
Mail list logo
