Any way this could be 1.2beta3a or something like that, at least for the
filenames and announcements? Calling it the exact same version is going
to confuse a number of people. The original version is also already on
the iBiblio maven repository...
BOGAERT Mathias wrote:
Guys,
Could you test
Andrew Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 14:20, Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
Is there anything special (different from last release) in the method
used to produce the .tgz versions of the 1.2b3 release files?
No, they all use the Ant task.
or some reason, WinZip (both 8.x and 9.0 beta
Is there anything special (different from last release) in the method
used to produce the .tgz versions of the 1.2b3 release files?
For some reason, WinZip (both 8.x and 9.0 beta) is unable to read the
xdoclet-bin-1.2b3.tgz and xdoclet-src-1.2b3.tgz files, but is able to
read the xdoclet-lib-1.
Yes!! I actually posted something to this effect a couple of times to
the maven list. I have tried both approaches, and except for the very
simple cases, it is simply easier, more flexible, and less work to just
use a normal ant-style configuration in maven.xml.
There is at least one email fr
James Taylor wrote:
As an aside, are you familiar with docutils / reStructuredText
(http://docutils.sf.net)? It is similar to aptdoc but is not indentation
sensitive (which I hate) and quite a bit more powerful. The gzz project
(http://gzz.info) uses it with jython for their documentation. I've b
ibute for the subtask is documented as 'version', in lowecase, but
the output jelly script is looking for 'Version', in uppercase.
Colin
Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
(I sent thtis earlier, but accidentally did a reply to a list member
instead of the list).
There appears to be a
(I sent thtis earlier, but accidentally did a reply to a list member
instead of the list).
There appears to be an inability for the maven plugin to set the jboss
subtask for ejbdoclet (and presumably weblogic and others as well)
'version' property, presumably due to the fact that it is an enum
I was very eager to pull down a couple of the other changes :-)
Aslak Hellesoy wrote:
>Sorry, I left the commented out when I was bugfixing. Ok now.
>
>Damn you're fast!
>
>Aslak
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&
ejbdoclet:
[ejbdoclet] (ModuleFinder.findModules112 ) Registering
XDoclet modules (searching for jars containing META-INF/xdoclet.xml) ...
[ejbdoclet] Running
...
[ejbdoclet] Running
[ejbdoclet] Generating EJB deployment descriptor (ejb-jar.xml).
[ejbdoclet] Running
[ejbdoclet]
The build (samples) is still quite broken...
Colin Sampaleanu wrote:
> Actually just to verify I even blew away everything and pulled down
> the whole project fresh, with the same result...
>
> Aslak Hellesoy wrote:
>
>> If you update xdoclet and xjavadoc
t;[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Colin
>>Sampaleanu
>>Sent: 5. juli 2002 20:19
>>To: Aslak Helles?y; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Build appears to be broken
>>
>>
>>I did an update from the current CVS (shortly after Aslak checked in
&
I did an update from the current CVS (shortly after Aslak checked in
about 5-6 changes, but I don't know if that's the problem, last build I
did was yesterday morning). Break happens on the samples:
-
...
samples:
init:
prepare:
[mkdir] Created dir:
D:\src\open\xdoclet\xdoclet\samp
Aslak Hellesoy wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Colin
>>Sampaleanu
>>Sent: 3. juli 2002 23:55
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] backwards weblogic:column-map locati
I am either very confused about how weblogic:column-map works, or there
is a bug. I am assuming it is the former, which is why I am not entering
this in the bugtracker, but I would very much apprciate a clarification.
I have a bidirectional one to many relationship between Application and
Vers
Rickard wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I (and most of our users and developers) have been able to build it
>> *for ages* (at least a few weeks now).
>
>
> I managed to get it to work by removing the lines that caused the errors.
>
>> The only build problem I am aware of is related to Ou
I did a build form CVS on Wed., and then another on Fri. Between those
two days something changed in the generation of docs. The main taskdef
docs now show up as almost empty. For example, EJBDocletTask.html file,
which previously showed all the attributes available for the 'ejbdoclet'
task, n
16 matches
Mail list logo
