Hi,
please do no longer use the @cellent.de email address to reach me.
Use the @pilhuhn.de or @users.sf.net address instead.
I will no longer have access to the @cellent.de addres after this
week.
Cheers
Heiko
---
SF email is sponsored b
testing the sf.net mail system :-/
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] version 1.2.3 in JIRA
Paul,
it was already there, but under
"unreleased". I set it to released now.
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Paul GalbraithGesendet: Mo 18.04.2005
20:00An: xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.netBetreff:
[Xdoclet-devel] version
Hi,
>Will there be a release candidate version first?
>IMHO, this would be a good idea.
I can do one this evening or on the weekend.
But CVS really should be quiet for some time ..
What about: CVS freeze 7am CET on 4/16 until ~3pm
(I'll send a 'go' after I did the update) ?
Heiko
--
Heiko
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] where is valueobjects.html?
Hi,
it is generated by a full build from
xdoclet/xdocs/valueobjects.xml
Heiko
Hi,
I just added Jason Essington as new developer to
help out with Webservices and JBoss related
issues.
Welcome on board, Jason
Heiko
--Heiko
W.Rupp JBoss Buch: http://www.dpunkt.de/buch/3-89864-318-2.html
;To: xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Release date projection for 1.3?
>
>Yes, a 1.2.3 releases sounds good for me.
>
>Matthias
>
>>On Sat, 2005-03-26 at 09:42, Rupp, Heiko wrote:
>>> We had this discussion a few weeks ago already ther
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Release date projection for 1.3?
Each developer should perhaps
set the target version to 1.3 in JIRA for issues he will work on soon and which
he thinks that they belong into 1.3
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Matthias GermannGesendet: Sa 26.03.2005
16:
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Release date projection for 1.3?
We had this discussion a few
weeks ago already there J2EE 1.4 and JDK 1.5 were identified.
I think Hibernate 3 support (at least
basic) should be in as well).
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Matthias GermannGes
Hi,
I provided to David Channon, Hibernate team member
to work on Hibernate issues.
Welcome David!
Heiko
I added Paul to the list of developers.
Welcome aboard.
Heiko
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Paul Galbraith
>Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 2:13 AM
>To: xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Re: Hibernat
Matthias wrote:
>Agreed. Anyone wanting access should voice themselves!
I second this.
--
Heiko W. Rupp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JBoss Buch: http://www.dpunkt.de/buch/3-89864-318-2.html
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] [Fwd: XDoclet 1.3]
Hi,
not that I am aware of.
My intention when setting the next version
1.3 was that this will be the JDK 1.5/5.0 supporting release.
This means fixing XJD-41 and resulting
fallout in the XDoclet side.
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag v
The merge directory is where you tell ejbdoclet to be it
:-)
Create a new directory in the project and build the same
directories in it as in the source path
where the corresponding java file can be
found
E.g.:
src/
de/
foo/
MyEJB.java
<-- needs merge file
ba
>rickardoberg - I know Rickard wrote the original EJBDoclet
>that evolved into XDoclet, but I can't remember him ever being
>involved in the project after the name change.
>schaefera - Likewise, Andreas was one of the old old guard,
>but I don't recall him having any involvement since the rena
commenting on issues in JIRA
>(as well as uploading patches).
>
>+0 for Michael. A couple of posts here asking for commit access and a
>few patches aren't exactly a lot to get to know him by. Best
>bet is to start a flame war here, Michael, to raise your visibility ;-)
>
>
Hi fellow developers,
please please please:
if there is a request for new developers then do answer.
Perhaps those requests should have a unique pattern in the
header so that they don't fall in your mail filters.
Again:
RfD
- Michael Kopp
- Matthias Germann (this was an old request of last y
Tom,
from a first reading, this sounds cool.
Some questions:
- Would the needed framework be available on a open source base?
- Do you have (complete) tag documentation in xtags.xml format?
- Could you write a "featured article" (basically like you did for
this mail) to include in the XDoclet w
Hi,
I just went through the issues hanging on XDT-457
and (hopefully :) fixed them.
Andrew is using XDT-457 as a master issue for
Servlet 2.4 / JSP 2.0 issues.
I propose closing XDT-457 and opening an new
general issue for Servlet 2.4
things, as XDT-457 is pretty old and new
issues/patches
Matthias,
I am sure, this is nothing personal, but "just" a
"the old comitters are busy/tired/... and the new
commiters don't really dare to step up" thing.
I hope to find some more spare time for Xdoclet again.
I am definitvely a +1 to giving you access.
Heiko
Hi @ll,
what do you think about giving Michael access?
+1
Heiko
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Michael Kopp
>Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 7:20 AM
>To: xdoclet-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS Write
Hi @ll,
I just want to give a sign of live. I've been very
busy @work and also on a private
project, let alone my little son.
I expect to work some more on Xdoclet again
starting in february.
So, happy 2005
Heiko
I hope this is ok now.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Eric Pugh
>Sent: Friday, November 26, 2004 11:14 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Need permissions to
>/htdocs/repository/xdoclet/plugins
>
>Hi all,
>
>Ha
For your info.
Meanwhile should all mirrors have the distribution files.
If not take the voxrox mirror.
Thanks to Andrew for his work to get this release out.
Thanks to everyone who submitted patches and bugreports.
Heiko
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
f: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] New
Developer proposal: Magnus Larsson
+1, I've got no issues with people helping out. Now we
just need tofind someone to make XDoclet JDK 5.0 compatible.
;-)MattOn Oct 30, 2004, at 6:32 AM, Mathias Bogaert
wrote:> +1>> Mathias>> On 30 Oct 2004, at
10:27,
HI,
I only received one response from Eric so
far.
Magnus meanwhile startet working on Websphere
v6
So I really think it would be good to have him on
board.
Heiko
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rupp,
HeikoSent: Friday, October 08, 2004 5:
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Better Hibernate Minds then Mine Required!
> Hope this helps. By the way, I'll probably
be tagging things for the> release once this is sorted out (I would have
done it tonight if this> hadn't come
up...)GREAT!!!
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS:xdoclet/modules/wsee/src/xdoclet/modules/wsee/resourcesweb-services_xml.xdt,1.1,1.2
Andrew,
you nearly got me :-)
EJB-Spec 2.1 refers to JSR-109 and JSR-921.
JSR-109 is WSEE1.0 and JSR-921 is WSEE1.1
The DTD-version is in JSR-109 and the
schema one in JSR-921.
Hi,
I'd like to propose Magnus Larsson, who provided
quite some support for IBM Ws5.x in XDT-1105-1108
including a testsuite.
I think he should be able (after 1.2.2 release) to
commit those himself.
Magnus is interested in becoming a
developer.
Heiko
Hi,
currently there are three unresolved issues marked
for 1.2.2 release.
There are a few more in 'resolved', but not-closed
state which are waiting
for documentation.
What else is lacking to get the release out of the
door?
Heiko
Title: [fmII] XDoclet 1.2.2 RC1 released (Default branch)
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Gesendet: So 26.09.2004
13:09An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: [fmII] XDoclet
1.2.2 RC1 released (Default branch)
This email is to inform you about the release of version '1.2.2
RC1'
Matt,
could you have a look at XDT-740 ?
Thanks
Heiko
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best
Hi,
after having sent this in private mail, I reiterate here with a
"changed timeframe"
Hi fellow developers,
I'd like to see a Xdoclet 1.2.2 out end of this month, following the
principle 'release often'. We did quite a good job since 1.2.1 closing
over 50 bugs and adding support for ws4ee and
Hi,
I'd like to propose two more developers
- Matthias German. He did some good patches in the past and would help
in getting some IBM WebSphere related things closed.
- Aleksei Valikov. He also did some good patches in the past and would
help
on the hibernate side
Heiko
--
i.A. Hei
Marko,
could you please submit the report + fix into JIRA, so it won't get
overlooked.
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/Dashboard.jspa
Thanks
Heiko
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Marko Friedemann
>Sent: Mo
Ok, that makes it four.
What is is his sf.net id?
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Rupp, Heiko
>Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 2:15 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Another develope
Hi Matt,
>I'll try to get it figured out before 1.2.2 - do we have a target date?
Not that I am aware of one.
I think we should aim for end of month.
Heiko
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2E
+1 from me as well.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of David Lloyd
>Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 5:30 PM
>To: XDoclet Developer List
>Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Another developer proposal
>
>I recommend CVS developer access for Nick Heu
Title: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] JIRA Issues
+5 :-)
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Andrew StevensGesendet: Mi 01.09.2004
08:19An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: RE:
[Xdoclet-devel] JIRA Issues
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 15:39, David Lloyd wrote:> On Mon,
30 Aug 2004, Rupp, Heiko wr
Hi,
I uploaded a new 1.2.2 snapshot as of this noon to sf.net to the
file download area.
Enjoy!
Heiko
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic
Mathias,
>We have loads of open, unresolved issues in JIRA, dating from
>2002 and 2003. I've already sent a mail once that perhaps we
>should close them, marked 'Outdated', and to leave it up to
>the original author to re-open if he still feels it's an issue
>with the current 1.2.2.
I partia
Hi,
does anyone know a source of documentation for the
Websphere (5+) deployment
descriptors? Perhaps their DTD or
Schema?
Thanks
Heiko
Hi,
I'd like to propose a few Xdoclet addicts :-) as
new developers
- Eric Pugh: Hibernate, Documentation
- David Harkness: David is very active in helping
ppl on the mailing lists and would work on documenatition and WLS
- Ryan Ovrevik: regression testing of
Xdoclet
- Marco Schulze: JDO2 su
Hi all,
at http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/snap200408191033/,
there is an inofficial snapshot as of this morning (10:33 mest)
available.
Changelog is at http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/snap200408191033/changes.html
Note, that the snapshot can vanish at any time
without notice.
Please
a) try
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] is cvs access down?
sf.net has an anon cvs outage
for some letters like 'x'.
See http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352&group_id=1
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Ryan OvrevikGesendet: Mi 18.08.2004
17:55An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff:
[Xdocl
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 1.2.2 Release Schedule
Nick,
there is not date scheuled afaik. I think
currently most developers are on vaccation, so it makes sense to wait until they
are back. Then we do a return-to-school release :-)
If your patches apply cleanly against your
local source
Hi,
I think I completely cleaned out the typed
collections from xjavadoc, that were marked as
deprecated.
In my local source tree I already erased those
files.
How shall I proceed now? I suspect, that this
should yield a version bump change
of xjavadoc?
Thanks
Heiko
Hi,
something that I have in mind for some time
now and where I got reminded by Ryan Ovrevik in
XDT-1002 and others is regresion testing.
I basically see three cases:
a) make sure that generated code compiles (and
would even run)
b) validate the generated xml - against a DTD and
some referenc
It compiles again (at least
for me :-)
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Rupp, HeikoGesendet: Fr 06.08.2004 22:40An:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: [Xdoclet-devel] HEAD
build probably broken
Hi @ll,
I probably broke the build of HEAD by only half
importing XDT-816.
I will take care of
Hi @ll,
I probably broke the build of HEAD by only half
importing XDT-816.
I will take care of it tomorrow, as I first need a
nap.
Sorry for any inconvenience.
Heiko
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] JIRA: can someone add a JSF component to JRA?
Thanks.
Thank you.
See XDT-988 at
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/browse/XDT-988
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Gopal MGesendet: So 01.08.2004 13:36An:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: [Xdoclet-devel] Updating
Javacc link
Hi,
At the following URL :-
http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/xdoclet/
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.2.2
Ok, I am done ...
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rupp,
HeikoSent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 1:28 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel]
1.2.2
Andrew,
not near enough, that I'll get them do
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.2.2
Andrew,
not near enough, that I'll get them done
within the next days.
So I'd say to release 1.2.2 and reflag
them.
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Andrew StevensGesendet: So 18.07.2004
12:54An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re:
[Xdoclet-deve
Hi Simon,
there is always interest. As far as I know there has no
work been done yet, but
you might browse through JIRA (http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/xdoclet/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=1)
to see if there are open issues wrt
this.
I guess the best way to start is to copy o
Hi,
>I just saw that JSF patches got submitted.
>I will try to incorporate them at the weekend.
>So hold the release until then -- I think this will be a real goodie.
The patch from XDT-951 is in - lets fire the 1.2.2 release
Heiko
---
This
Hi,
is the following the right thing to
do?
Thanks
Heiko
Index:
JBossTagsHandler.java===RCS
file:
/cvsroot/xdoclet/xdoclet/modules/jboss/src/xdoclet/modules/jboss/ejb/JBossTagsHandler.java,vretrieving
revision 1.11diff
Clifton,
I can't say anything on Xdoclet2, but I am willing to help
you (*) on xdoclet1, if you want commit access.
Heiko
(*) limited time permitting
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Clifton C. Craig
>Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004
Markus,
>Key: XDT-951
>Summary: Java Server Faces Support
> Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Markus Plattner
are you interested in adding the missing bits and pieces?
Heiko
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Brief
Hi,
I just saw that JSF patches got submitted.
I will try to incorporate them at the weekend.
So hold the release until then -- I think this will
be a real goodie.
Heiko
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
At
I am definitively in favour of a release.
I don't really have time to look after things at the moment, but
if we release often, this doesn't matter, as the next release
afterwards will be soon enough.
So: +1
Heiko
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Submitting in JIRA is definitvely the right way.
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
>Of Dirk Sturzebecher (OVSAG)
>Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 8:52 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Java Server Faces
>
>> I'm new to
Hi,
>I'm currently updating the WebSphere subTask for making it
>websphere 5.1 compliant, however as a lot of companies I'm
>working on a project with xdoclet
>1.1.2 and not the 1.2. So I'd like to give the work I've done
>to the XDoclet main project however it will be on 1.1.2
>semantics (.j
Hi,
can the one who set up the freshmeat entry (Marcus
- pazu) please update it?
It still points at 1.2b1.
Heiko
Hi,
I would like to see the " We are working on XDoclet 2" being reworded.
This too much sounds like 1.2.x is dead, which it is not, even if
Xdoclet 2 will take over at some time.
Perhaps something like: In paralell of evolving/improving 1.2.x, we
are also working on 2.0, which ...
Heiko
---
Mathias,
do you mean the web pages? Do a Shift-Reload.
Heiko
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software
Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver
higher performing products faster, at low TCO.
> the release. Any idea when the next one might be?
We should probably aim for something like within two months
from now (for a 1.2.2)?
Heiko
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit th
Matt,
> Rather than continuing to submit patches, please let me know
> when you're interested in committing this stuff - and I'll
> supply a patch then. I also cleaned up all the deprecation
> errors in the apache module.
shouldn't you have CVS access by now?
I am not sure about quiet period
Stefan,
> and we can certainly turn off nagging. Gump is trying to help, not to
> annoy.
Yeah, sure. Sorry if I sounded rude.
For me it currently like we (Andrew) is changing a property and
then waiting for a night to see how gump behaves. Then then do
that loop again.
That's why I said "tell us
Can't any of the gump guys tell us, what they expect?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer exp
Title: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Commented: (XDT-432) Added indexed properties support to validationxml task
Welcome aboard
:-)
> My SF id is
mraible.
+2 :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Erik
> Hatcher
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:01 PM
> To: XDoclet Devel
> Subject: Fwd: [Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet-JIRA] Commented:
> (XDT-432) Added
> indexed properties support to validationx
> Maybe we should release xjavadoc 1.0.3?
This should probably happen together with the release
of Xdoclet 1.2.1.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
G
Hi,
> submit a patch until HEAD is working.
What do you mean with "head is not working"?
I just updated my source and the compile just runs fine.
You probably need to update your xjavadoc source as well,
as there has been a change lately.
Heiko
--
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] merge points
Sounds good to me as well.
Why not call them .mrg?
Andrew,
> Well, it's too late in the evening to do it now, besides which I just
> got a bunch of merge conflicts when I updated ;-) I suggest
> we aim for
> the end of the week, so people have a few more days to do any
> other bug
So, you would tag aproximately friday evening?
This would mean
Jonathan,
you did provide some patches in the past.
Are you interested in getting CVS access?
Heiko
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:25 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-de
Mathias,
if / when we do a release, we should announce a quiet perio in cvs, where no
cvs activity should happen other than the release master doing things like
bumping version numbers or adding change log information.
The quiet period should be imho announced one or two days in advance and las
*argh* I hate changing the EOL settings. Now a diff is on the whole file
*sigh*
Anyway:
I would like to thorow the following out of
ParameterTagsHandler.java:parameterList() (at the very end):
if (result.indexOf("null") != -1)
{ throw
new XDocletException("GA
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] Time for a release?
Mathias,
I am very much in favour of this.
Perhaps we could get some of the blockers
cleaned up before releasing.
But I don't want to postpone a release for
more than a week or such.
Better bring the release soon with many
open bugs than wait f
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Where o where has JIRA gone?
+1
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von David LloydGesendet: Do 15.04.2004 18:54An:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Where
o where has JIRA gone?
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] Where o where has JIRA gone?
Looks like Atlassian is doing
an upgrade or such :-/
Btw.: You submitted quite some patches. Are
you interested to directly get CVS access?
If so, send a mail to this
list.
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von David LloydG
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xdoclet build-docs.xml,1.29,1.30 project.xml,1.36,1.37
Great!
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Mathias BogaertGesendet: Do 15.04.2004
14:06An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff:
[Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xdoclet build-docs.xml,1.29,1.30
project.xml,1.36,1.37
Update o
e the best.
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Andrew StevensGesendet: Di 13.04.2004
02:09An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re:
[Xdoclet-devel] Jira namesrver problems
On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 09:57, Rupp, Heiko wrote:>
Hi,> I can't access Jira since saturday or
Hi,
I can't access Jira since saturday or so. Browser
says 'opensource.atlassian.com can not be found'.
I did see sporadic nameserver failues in the past,
but not a days long downtime.
Can anyone inform the admins there?
Thanks
Heiko
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] CVS: xdoclet/modules/hibernate/src/xdoclet/modules/hibernate/resources hibernate-properties.xdt,1.21,1.22
Uh, you are right. Sorry.
:-(
I am gonna fix this.
Heiko
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Mathias BogaertGesendet: Fr 09.04.2004
21:39An: [EMAIL P
Title: [Xdoclet-devel] FW: Old Jira issue XDT-763 unanswered
Matthias,
probably lack of time. Hey, and not even
you voted to get it fixed :-)
Could you provide a snipet of the DD you
want to create?
To me it looks like your *Impl is like the
class generated by Xdoclet (BlaSession for
Probably "jconley".
I sent him mail to mail the list if he is interested.
Heiko
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mathias Bogaert
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 1:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Cvs access vote
Does
Hi,
Johnathan
Conley did some patches/enhancements among which is Webshpere 8.1
integration.
(XDT-694, XDT-681, XDT-666), so I think he could be another
candidate.
Heiko
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Thanks and welcome to
all.
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Mathias BogaertGesendet: Sa 03.04.2004
10:50An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re:
[Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page ViewsGranted you commit acces
votes is enough to get commit
access.Mathias- Original Message -From: "Rupp,
Heiko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004
4:29 PMSubject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page ViewsIn the
past, I had voted for myself, but as I don'
404 Not FoundCould not execute action [Dashboard]:null
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
>
>
> I'm more than happy to vote in new committers for XDoclet 1.2
> codebase.
> Please lobby for them by sending folks names and pointers to their
> contributions so we can evaluate them.
>
>
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Eric,
if you guys that maintained xdoclet in the past have no
time/interest/business
scope to further work on xdoclet, then let others work on it. There
are pepole
out there that did submit valuable patches that should asap go into
a 1.2.x or
Hi,
are there any plans on doing subsequent releases on the 1.x series or is
only
2.x being worked on now?
Thanks
Heiko
Hi,
are there plans to integrate xdt-399 in 1.2?
Heiko
--
Heiko W. Rupp EMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Consultant Telefon: +49 711 222 992 - 900
Cellent AG Finance SolutionsTelefax: +49 711 222 992 - 999
Calwer Str. 33 D-70173 Stuttgart
+1
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-
Hi,
> is there planned to support WebSphere 5.0 in XDoclet2?
I did not find (with a quick search) a reference for it in JIRA.
So, I guess the standard answer applies:
Yes, it is a good idea. Provide a patch in JIRA and the support will
be there :-)
Heiko
--
Bancotec GmbH EMail: [EMAIL P
This was the best news to get.
Thanks!!!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] [XDoclet JIRA] Closed: (XDT-406) webdoclet does
not su
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
