RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 imminent

2002-03-10 Thread Vincent Harcq
53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 imminent > > > I removed the sub-task from the samples' build (to stop > people getting too curious about it before it's ready), but then the > samples stopped building... > > I was getting a NPE

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 imminent

2002-03-09 Thread Andrew Stevens
I removed the sub-task from the samples' build (to stop people getting too curious about it before it's ready), but then the samples stopped building... I was getting a NPE due to a getSubTask().getValueObjectClassPattern() in the ValueObjectsTagsHandler (line 77 - getCurrentValueObjectClass)

[Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 imminent

2002-03-07 Thread Andrew Stevens
Heh, I thought I'd have it built and finished tonight, then IE started giving "Cannot find server or DNS Error" messages all the time while I was trying to review the tracker entries for CHANGES.TXT :-( I'm too tired to fight it any more tonight; I'll finish it off and do the 1.1.2 release tom

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 early warning

2002-02-26 Thread David Jencks
Thanks for the warning. I have a subtask + template for generating xml mbean descriptors for jbossmx. I will try to get it in today or tomorrow. Thanks david jencks On 2002.02.26 03:06:00 -0500 Andrew Stevens wrote: > It's that time again... here's an early warning of the next build. > > I'm

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 early warning

2002-02-26 Thread Ara Abrahamian
Great. I'll commit my stuff asap. Ara. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Stevens > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:36 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

[Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 early warning

2002-02-25 Thread Andrew Stevens
It's that time again... here's an early warning of the next build. I'm planning to do the 1.1.2 release around the end of the week (probably at the weekend, when I'll have more time to sort out the changes.txt and figure out tagging in WinCVS). I'll do up another list of the outstanding stuff

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-20 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> > PS: Andrew, do you have release manager access or should I open it for > > you? Of course if you're interested to become the release manager :o) > > > > Cheers, > > Ara. > > Okay, but don't tell my wife - she thinks I'm busy enough already ;-) > And no, I don't have access to the file release

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-19 Thread Andrew Stevens
A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said: > PS: Andrew, do you have release manager access or should I open it for > you? Of course if you're interested to become the release manager :o) > > Cheers, > Ara. Okay, but don't tell my wife - she thinks I'm busy e

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-16 Thread Vincent Harcq
Fixed > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf > Of Ara Abrahamian > Sent: vendredi 15 février 2002 14:04 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 > > > Samples don't build successf

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
- Original Message - From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Try templateFile (works everywhere): > Ok, cool. I think I already knew that for the web.xml one. But how about sub-tasks that use multiple templates? Specifying a custom one of those is not currently possible, or at l

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> Many thanks! I saw the commit message. Is it possible to get the commit > messages to e-mail the full CVS diff too? Or is that not desired? I > really > enjoy learning under the hood by seeing the diffs on the Jakarta lists. > It > would help me learn more here too without having to dig into

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> Another feature request I have is to make each of the "sub" tasks that use > templates implement a way to override that template from Ant like > specifying a different web.xml template on the > subtask and such. This seems like it should be a regular convention so > that > support would be

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
ile be added to the web.xml template too?! :)) Thanks, Erik - Original Message - From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:24 AM Subject: Re: [

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Vincent Harcq
Hi All, On point 6 and 9 My work on new value object is not finished yet. Neither not documented at all :( But it should not break anything :) So just don't talk about it yet,if people want to try, I would encourage that, but I would prefer to avoid document a feature that is not finished. Hav

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Ara Abrahamian
Samples don't build successfully anymore: [javac] D:\Projects\xdoclet\core\samples\gen-src\java\test\ejb\AccountCMP.java:1 37: cannot resolve symbol [javac] symbol : class CustomerBMPUtil [javac] location: package interfaces [javac] setOwner(test.interfaces.CustomerBMPUtil.getHom

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Ara Abrahamian
Thanks for reminding it, done. Ara. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Erik Hatcher > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 3:55 PM > To: Ara Abrahamian; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 7:14 AM Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2 > > > Also when will we release 1.1.2? I think we can fix it for > > > next week. > > > > What is/isn't on the list for 1.1.2, then? > > > > 1. Consolidate i1

[Xdoclet-devel] 1.1.2

2002-02-15 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> > Also when will we release 1.1.2? I think we can fix it for > > next week. > > What is/isn't on the list for 1.1.2, then? > > 1. Consolidate i18n messages. Ok. > 2. Translations for at least one other language. (saves effort if 1's done > first, though) Not high priority imho. Keep it for