RE: [Xdoclet-devel] CustomerBMPBean sample

2002-03-04 Thread Andrew Stevens
A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said: > @namespace.tag is the recommended syntax for users, but you write your > template files with the old namespace:tag syntax so that the old syntax > is also supported. > > Andrew, please make it item #1 in 1.1.2's cha

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] CustomerBMPBean sample

2002-03-04 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> >JDK1.4's javadoc tool prints warnings when it encounters unknown @tags. > >You have to list all your non-standard tags with -tag option, if you > >don't want to get lost in the noise of those warnings. But -tag >receives > >a : separated list of tags! So we can't list are namespace:tagname tags

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] CustomerBMPBean sample

2002-03-04 Thread Andrew Stevens
>FROM: Ara Abrahamian >DATE: 03/02/2002 03:01:14 > >Yup, it's correct. See my commit messages: ... >JDK1.4's javadoc tool prints warnings when it encounters unknown @tags. >You have to list all your non-standard tags with -tag option, if you >don't want to get lost in the noise of those warnings.

[Xdoclet-devel] CustomerBMPBean sample

2002-03-01 Thread Andrew Stevens
I was just editing CustomerBMPBean to test my DAO changes, and noticed that all the class-level tags are using "@ejb.whatever" instead of "@ejb:..." etc. It's the only one which does that - is it correct? Andrew. ___ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMA