Yup, it's zero length array.
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Stevens
> Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2002 1:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Javadoc API quer
Hopefully just a quickie - if a method has no parameters, does
MethodDoc.parameters() return a zero length array or a null? The API docs
just say "Returns: an array of Parameter, one element per argument in the
order the arguments are present." so I assume it'd be a zero length array,
but I t
Ooops
I was out of xdoclet for too long, I got it now.
Thanks
Vincent.
> > Javadoc 1.4 have a new tag @inheritDoc that allows to copy the doc
> from
> > the superclasses/methods in the doc of the class that is generated.
> > Have somebody tried it ? I guess that with that a changed
> supercla
> Javadoc 1.4 have a new tag @inheritDoc that allows to copy the doc
from
> the superclasses/methods in the doc of the class that is generated.
> Have somebody tried it ?
> I guess that with that a changed superclass will be seen by javadoc
and
> the doc re-generated.
> It is the biggest problem t
>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Javadoc 1.4 @inheritDoc
>Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:43:41 +0100
>
>Hi,
>Javadoc 1.4 have a new tag @inheritDoc that allows to copy the doc from
>the superclasses/methods in the doc of the class that is generated.
>H
Hi,
Javadoc 1.4 have a new tag @inheritDoc that allows to copy the doc from
the superclasses/methods in the doc of the class that is generated.
Have somebody tried it ?
I guess that with that a changed superclass will be seen by javadoc and
the doc re-generated.
It is the biggest problem today tha
Hey
I'm going through the XDoclet code, and I'm noticing that the Javadoc is
really absent overall in the code. That is bad in general, but very bad
for an OpenSource project that's supposed to be extensible. After 1.0
the code really does need a makeover comment-wise. It will make it more
useful
e-
> From: Ara Abrahamian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 9:47 AM
> To: 'A. P. Marki'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] javadoc 1.4
>
>
> I works for me. I replaced ant.jar in core/lib and core/samples/lib with
> ant.jar from
d AFAIK no version of javadoc does that.
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of A. P. Marki
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 5:55 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] javadoc 1.4
>
>
Has anyone tried xdoclet with j2sdk 1.4 beta? The sdk has a rewritten
javadoc, and it exits when javac doesn't find the classes xdoclet wants to
generate, instead of issuing warnings like currently.
I don't see any option to pass in to change this behavior, and it's a show
stopper.
Andrew
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
