Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-07 Thread aslak.hellesoy
/test case for XGG to have support for 1.1. Aslak - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Stevens) Date: Monday, October 7, 2002 8:23 am Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process > A wise old hermit known only as Konstantin Priblouda > <[EMAIL

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-07 Thread Dmitri Colebatch
> > http://users.pandora.be/ees/xdoclet/development/design.html > > > ?? especially > > > "NO more support for EJB 1.0 and 1.1, use XDoclet > > > 1.2 for this"?? > > +1 > > -0 Our app servers are still on a version that only supports 1.1 (the > later ones that support 2.0 haven't gone through a

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-06 Thread Andrew Stevens
A wise old hermit known only as Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said: > http://users.pandora.be/ees/xdoclet/development/design.html > > ?? especially > > "NO more support for EJB 1.0 and 1.1, use XDoclet > > 1.2 for this"?? > +1 -0 Our app servers are still on a version that onl

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-05 Thread Aslak Hellesøy
> -Original Message- > From: Mathias Bogaert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 6. oktober 2002 02:55 > To: Aslak Hellesøy; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process > > > Good thing to bring this up. I really prefer b). &

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-05 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
http://users.pandora.be/ees/xdoclet/development/design.html > ?? especially > "NO more support for EJB 1.0 and 1.1, use XDoclet > 1.2 for this"?? +1 = Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik )Freelance Software developer < http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de > < render

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-05 Thread Mathias Bogaert
should be XDoclet done right! So beware :-) Mathias - Original Message - From: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 7:01 AM Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process > Hi folks, > > Over

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-05 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Aslak Hellesøy > Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 5:32 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process > > Hi folks, >

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-05 Thread Aslak Hellesoy
> > -There will be one plugin for each DTD/XML > > I think it would be too fine grained sometimes. In > JBOOSS module you will have to generate at least 2 > xml files - one for CMP and one for JBoss stuff. > But basically idea is OK. > I'll think about a way to group several DTDs/XMLs into one

Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-05 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
> Some explanations: > -Let's use the term "plugin" in stead of "module". > That's what they are, > isn't it? +1 > -Each component should provide their own > documentation (xdoc). +1 > -There will be one plugin for each DTD/XML I think it would be too fine grained sometimes. In JBOOSS module you

[Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet 2 structure and process

2002-10-05 Thread Aslak Hellesøy
Hi folks, Over the past six months there has been many discussions on email and messenger between the developers regarding the new XDoclet Velocity architecture. Some of us have already started to work on this. The build process is currently quite complicated, and we have to improve that. The wa