Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Thanks and welcome to
all.
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im Auftrag von Mathias BogaertGesendet: Sa 03.04.2004
10:50An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Betreff: Re:
[Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page ViewsGranted you commit
Erik Hatcher wrote:
Antoine Levy-Lambert is doing work with Gump and Ant, and he has
expressed interest in becoming a committer. Most recently he
submitted a change to the build file to make it Gump compatible. I am
nominating him to be a committer. +1
Erik
Thanks Erik,
cheers,
Ant
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mathias
> Bogaert
> Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 3:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
>
>
> +1
>
> Mathias
>
>
+1
Mathias
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
> Antoine Levy-Lambert is doing work with Gump and Ant, and he has
> ex
Antoine Levy-Lambert is doing work with Gump and Ant, and he has
expressed interest in becoming a committer. Most recently he submitted
a change to the build file to make it Gump compatible. I am nominating
him to be a committer. +1
Erik
--
Can you tell me which patch you submitted? And perhaps your sourceforge id?
Mathias
- Original Message -
From: "David Lloyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
> &g
Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page ViewsGranted you commit access. Enjoy, and
welcome to the team!
Mathias
- Original Message -
From: Rupp, Heiko
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 9:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Ok
*step forward*
I submitted
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Ok
*step forward*
I submitted some patches in the past
(XDT-399, XDT-496, XDT-338, XDT-329, XDT-316, XDT-277)
Work area for me would be mostly jboss, my
submitted items and hibernate.
Heiko ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im
> I suggest that all people who want CVS access come forward by sending a
> mail to the list. Please include references on which patches you
> provided. I would say 3 positive votes is enough to get commit access.
I am interested in CVS access, even though I've only submitted one patch
so far (th
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 4:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
In the past, I had voted for myself, but as I don't have too much time
at the moment .. work areas would be jboss related things.
Else, I will / could look up pat
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
>
>
> I'm more than happy to vote in new committers for XDoclet 1.2
> codebase.
> Please lobby for them by sending folks names and pointers to their
> contributions so we can evaluate them.
>
>
at are on my hard drive :-)
Andrew.
>
> Cheers,
> Mathias
>
>
> >- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
> >Van
> : Andrew Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Verzonden
> : maandag
> , maart
> 29, 2004 12:07 AM
> >Aan
> : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
XDoclet is being discovered by the big players.
Cheers,
Mathias
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van
: Andrew Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden
: maandag
, maart
29, 2004 12:07 AM
>Aan
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Onderwerp
: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
>
>On Su
I'm more than happy to vote in new committers for XDoclet 1.2 codebase.
Please lobby for them by sending folks names and pointers to their
contributions so we can evaluate them.
Erik
On Mar 28, 2004, at 1:27 PM, Rupp, Heiko wrote:
Eric,
if you guys that maintained xdoclet in the past have
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 15:13, Mathias Bogaert wrote:
> In case you missed it:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/index.php?report=months&group_id=31602
The stats are total crap. Since we use JIRA not the SF trackers, the
only columns that can be expected to show anything are the downloads and
Title: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] XDoclet Page Views
Eric,
if you guys that maintained xdoclet in the past have no
time/interest/business
scope to further work on xdoclet, then let others work on it. There
are pepole
out there that did submit valuable patches that should asap go into
a 1.2.x or
Mathias,
I'm not sure what you have in mind, but here is my latest scoop. I
currently am not using Struts, and my new framework of choice
(Tapestry) does not need XDoclet generation.
The big projects I'm on do use stateless session beans and we continue
to use XDoclet 1.2 for generating lo
In case you missed it:
http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/index.php?report=months&group_id=31602
Perhaps now is a good time for the dev team to sit together (IM or chat) and
refocus (revitalise) our efforts.
Mathias
---
This SF.Net email is
18 matches
Mail list logo
