in JIRA.
>
> -1 for beta 4, it has taken long enough to get to 1.2, and we should put
> effort in XDoclet2, not in 1.2 anymore.
>
> Cheers,
> Mathias
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Andrew Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EM
-
From: "Andrew Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 12:20 AM
Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] beta 3
> What's the verdict on beta 3? JIRA still lists it as unreleased, the
> source zip still doesn't build, and the
On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 01:49, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I'm in the midst of applying the new Velocity patch, but separating the
> BSF from it for the time being. I'm making it part of the Apache
> module. I can hold off on committing it if it should not be in the 1.2
> release.
Don't hold off on c
only one working so far took over one hour. Is this my
problem or how long should I expect a diff to take? I'm on a Telstra T3.
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] beta
+1 on going final ASAP.
I'm in the midst of applying the new Velocity patch, but separating the
BSF from it for the time being. I'm making it part of the Apache
module. I can hold off on committing it if it should not be in the 1.2
release.
Erik
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 06:20 PM, A
What's the verdict on beta 3? JIRA still lists it as unreleased, the
source zip still doesn't build, and the binaries zip's jars all say
they're beta 4. Are we going to fix it, or just leave it as it is now
that it's out there? And if we're just leaving it, what's the next
version going to be?
Hi guys,
The general intent is to only have beta 2 and then final, but due to the
amount of bugs we receive, I would suggest we have a beta 3. +1 from me.
BTW beta 2 should be released somewhere next weekAndrew?
Mathias
---
This SF.net e
