OK guys, v1.0 ditro is ready. I also added webwork.jar so that samples
compiles out of the box. It's 995KB zip :o)
I'm going tag it and upload it in 2-3 hours. Nothing left to add? Aslak,
is your stuff ok? Let me know asap.
Ara.
_
Do You
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Andrew Stevens wrote:
> True, I was just trying to think of a way that didn't rely on having to
> add abstract methods just to put tags on. I seem to remember there was
> some other tag parameter (finder permissions, maybe?) added for similar
> reasons a while ago.
I thi
A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once
said:
> > > > 0- ejb:relation: remove target-multiple by looking at method
> return
> > > > type and use it for the other end of relation
> > > > 0.1- make getData automatically appear in remote interface (?)
> >
> > 3 opti
Colebatch
> Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2001 10:49 AM
> To: Ara Abrahamian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
>
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
>
> > For v1.1 we should change the way samples are organized.
>
>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> >
> > A wise old hermit known only as Andrew Stevens
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> >
> > > A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> > > 0- ejb:relation: remove target-multiple by looking at method
return
> > > type and use it for the other end of relation
> > > 0.1- make getData automatically appear in remote interface (?)
>
> 3 options come to mind:
> - a parameter to @ejb:data-object for
remoteSetData="true(default)|false
should change the way samples are organized.
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Stevens
> Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2001 1:41 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 st
A wise old hermit known only as Andrew Stevens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once
> said:
> > You are right. I forgot BMPs. For a BMP you need to also declare
> > ejb:finder for the class?!?
>
> Not sure - they seemed to ne
A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once
said:
> OK guys,
> We're almost getting ready for v1.0. I think we can release it on Monday
> after having docs for websphere/jmx/webworks. Please write the docs
> ASAP!
>
> > 0- ejb:relation: remove target-multiple by look
OK guys,
We're almost getting ready for v1.0. I think we can release it on Monday
after having docs for websphere/jmx/webworks. Please write the docs
ASAP!
> 0- ejb:relation: remove target-multiple by looking at method return
type
> and use it for the other end of relation
> 0.1- make getData aut
A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once
said:
> > > Oh yeah, you're right. But ifFinderMethod is useless, cause there's
> no
> > > findBy method in bean impl but in ejb:finder in class tags :o)
> > > AFAIK we can remove it.
> > >
> > > Ara.
> >
> > And what about
> > Oh yeah, you're right. But ifFinderMethod is useless, cause there's
no
> > findBy method in bean impl but in ejb:finder in class tags :o)
> > AFAIK we can remove it.
> >
> > Ara.
>
> And what about BMP beans? I *do* have various ejbFindByX methods...
> Speaking of which, I'd quite like not t
uot; or similar just my 2c
cheesr
dim
> Ara.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:30 PM
> > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [
; > From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:30 PM
> > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> >
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:39 PM
> > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> >
> > > 0.2- Is AbstractEjbSubTask.isInterfaceMethod()
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 6:30 PM
> To: Ara Abrahamian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
>
> > Oh yeah, you're right. But ifFinderMethod is useless, cause there's
no
>
PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 12:39 PM
> > To: Ara Abrahamian
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
> >
> > On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> >
> > > 0.2- Is AbstractEjbSubTask.
2001 12:39 PM
> To: Ara Abrahamian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
>
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
>
> > 0.2- Is AbstractEjbSubTask.isInterfaceMethod() ok? It uses
> > startsWith("ejbCreate")/blabla
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> 0.2- Is AbstractEjbSubTask.isInterfaceMethod() ok? It uses
> startsWith("ejbCreate")/blabla whereas it should look at
> ejb:create-method/blabla.
I think this is ok... because: it is only isRemoveMethod and
isFinderMethod that check this way, and we d
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> So I can safely write my orion/etc docs without fear of being
> overwritten or interfering?
(o: yep, all yours... the only docs I'm doing now are just flushing
things out a bit as I go through various bits of code (see the changes to
the ejb:pk docs)
Undone Items: 20-21-22-25-26-17-15-16
Mostly docs and stuff like that, except 15-16-20.
I add new items:
0- ejb:relation: remove target-multiple by looking at method return type
and use it for the other end of relation
0.1- make getData automatically appear in remote interface (?)
0.2- Is Abstra
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
>
> > > 4- [ #446350 ] Can't use both packagenames and fileset
> > > Docs should be updated, change 'either' to 'or' fo
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> > 4- [ #446350 ] Can't use both packagenames and fileset
> > Docs should be updated, change 'either' to 'or' for now.
docs updated.
> > Other:
> > 8- In ejb.html, it should be specified whether a tag is for ejb 2.0,
> for
> > example primkey-field
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Hey, are you a superman?! :-)
no - my girlfriend is a flight attendant... and when she's away there's
not much to do at home!
> > > > 11- Use a transaction-type param for @ejb:finder instead of
> defining
> > > the
> > > > real ejbFind... method just
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] v1.0 status so far
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
>
> > > 11- Use a transaction-type param for @ejb:finder instead of
defining
> > the
> > > real ejbFind... method just to set a transaction.
>
> this
On Sat, 8 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> > 11- Use a transaction-type param for @ejb:finder instead of defining
> the
> > real ejbFind... method just to set a transaction.
this is just a case of changin asm-descriptor to loop through class level
ejb:finder tags as well as methods with ejb:tra
> XDoclet Bugs/Features:
> 1- [ #449838 ] Generate only getter for persistent flds
> Refer to the Andrew's proposed solution
Fixed.
> 3- [ #456464 ] Line termination behaves differently
> Can someone check this?
Fixed.
> 4- [ #446350 ] Can't use both packagenames and fileset
>
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Postponed XDoclet Bugs/Features:
> 2- [ #456468 ] @xdoclet-generated tag
as you might have seen from the recent cvs, I just thought I was doing
this but in fact did something completely different. My reading of the
request is that xdoclet should know
> XDoclet Bugs/Features:
> 1- [ #449838 ] Generate only getter for persistent flds
> Refer to the Andrew's proposed solution
Fixed.
> 3- [ #456464 ] Line termination behaves differently
> Can someone check this?
Fixed.
> 4- [ #446350 ] Can't use both packagenames and fileset
>
> > 6- [ #438613 ] Support for Business interface pattern
>
> Because...? It's been debated before, and it's not really useful in
the
> code generation case (unless I've missed something).
It's sometimes needed. For example I created a RMI/SOAP-like thing for
our remote clients. It uses Proxy cl
Yes indeed. Package = xdoclet.web.vendor
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rickard Öberg
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel
> > > 5- [ #444503 ] Support more than one servlet per class
> >
> > Skip this one. Too obscure to be relevant.
>
> I agree its obscure, and agree it can be put off for now... but I just
> today came across the same requirement for session beans... not sure
how
> we would do it though... perhaps
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> 0.95 is way way waaay outdated. Use CVS or wait for 1.0-RC1 which should
> be out real soon now.
sounds familar, yep, building cvs atm
> Should I just add it to CVS?
Ara said to didn't he? hell if it works (o: and after all, you did
star
Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> > If so, I'd recommend that you look at WebWork :-) It allows you to do
> > that, but much simpler :-)
>
> ok - I'm looking at it now (o: I cant help but notice that its got to
> version 0.95... lol, the same version that EJBDoclet was when I was
> introduced to it (o:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> So.. you mean you have one servlet, which redirects to multiple JSP's.
> And you want to be able to use the same servlet with multiple JSP's.
> Right?
well, I have one class, but multiple servlet instances, each with their
own name and confi
Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> > "Messy" was my thought. Why do you need it? Why is it a requirement?
>
> for the situations where you have one servlet and multiple views of that
> servlet that depend on different configurations - unless I'm miss
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> "Messy" was my thought. Why do you need it? Why is it a requirement?
for the situations where you have one servlet and multiple views of that
servlet that depend on different configurations - unless I'm missing a
really obvious way to do tha
Dmitri Colebatch wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> > > Postponed EJBDoclet Bugs/Features:
> > > 5- [ #444503 ] Support more than one servlet per class
> >
> > Skip this one. Too obscure to be relevant.
>
> I agree its obscure, and agree it can be put off for now...
On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Rickard [iso-8859-1] Öberg wrote:
> > Postponed EJBDoclet Bugs/Features:
> > 5- [ #444503 ] Support more than one servlet per class
>
> Skip this one. Too obscure to be relevant.
I agree its obscure, and agree it can be put off for now... but I just
today came across the same
A couple of comments.
Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Postponed EJBDoclet Bugs/Features:
> 5- [ #444503 ] Support more than one servlet per class
Skip this one. Too obscure to be relevant.
> 6- [ #438613 ] Support for Business interface pattern
Because...? It's been debated before, and it's not really
Here is a list of the things that we need to complete for v1.0. If you
implement one of these items, then put the item number in your cvs log
when committing, so that I know which one is done/undone. Also if you
want to subscribe (!) for implementing it then reply to this email and
put your name i
41 matches
Mail list logo
