RE: [Xdoclet-devel] FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @tags in middle

2002-06-05 Thread Ara Abrahamian
We can assume: '' -> ' {a_number} -> substitution parameter {whatever else} -> whatever user typed Will it hurt anyone? No imho. What do you think? Ara. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Stevens > Sent: Wednes

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Serious bug

2002-06-05 Thread Ara Abrahamian
Why do you add ejb:persistent-field for setModificationDate? getModificationDate is enough. Btw, I believe we should recheck isOfType(). Something has changed its behavior during the latest conversions. I've been trying to upgrade my app/templates to latest code and it fails because of an isOfTyp

Re: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Serious bug

2002-06-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, because I have a method public void markModified() { setModificationDate(new Date()); } But, indeed, I could remove it. One little question: when programming entity beans, that have the exact same signature for getter and setter, I can omit the setter? Only if I want to s

Re: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] FW: [ jrefactory-FeatureRequests-460400 ] @tags in middle

2002-06-05 Thread aslak.hellesoy
This must be documented in our docs. It can go into a devdocs.xml file under xdocs Can you add it Ara? Asla´k - Original Message - From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2002 11:21 am Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @

[Xdoclet-devel] RE: FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @tags in middle

2002-06-05 Thread Andrew Stevens
>From: Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 2002-06-05 10:22 > >We can assume: > >'' -> ' >{a_number} -> substitution parameter >{whatever else} -> whatever user typed > >Will it hurt anyone? No imho. What do you think? Take a closer look at the message in the quoted stuff, the desired outpu

[Xdoclet-devel] RE: FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @tags in middle of a javadoc

2002-06-05 Thread Andrew Stevens
>From: Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: 2002-06-03 05:29 > >I've slightly changed the way I decided to implement msg:bundle. I soon >realized that put @msg:bundle in a method's javadoc comments is not the >best idea, because: >- we might define a msg for method a() and also use it for met

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @tags in middle of a javadoc

2002-06-05 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> >So right now I define a Messages class for each package and > >define resource keys there: > > > >/** > >* @msg:bundle msg="this is a message" > >*/ > >public static final String A_MESSAGE_KEY = "A_MESSAGE_KEY"; > > > >So in your favorite IDE just type XDocletModulesEjbMessages.| and there > >i

RE: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @tags in middle

2002-06-05 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> This must be documented in our docs. > > It can go into a devdocs.xml file under xdocs > Can you add it Ara? Sure, but after being implemented :-) Btw, Aslak, can you fix those xjavadoc firstSentenceblabla bugs? :-) > Asla´k Ara. > - Original Message - > From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EM

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @tags in middle

2002-06-05 Thread Ara Abrahamian
> >We can assume: > > > >'' -> ' > >{a_number} -> substitution parameter > >{whatever else} -> whatever user typed > > > >Will it hurt anyone? No imho. What do you think? > > Take a closer look at the message in the quoted stuff, the desired output > is > 'pattern' parameter does not have a '{1}'

RE: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: FW: [ jrefactory-Feature Requests-460400 ] @tags inmiddle

2002-06-05 Thread Andrew Stevens
>From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:56:22 +0430 > >But we're not displaying "{1}StateHolder" anywhere. It's the format of >pattern parameter. So unlikely let's forget it for now :-) We don't display "{1}StateHolder", but we do print a literal "{0}" or "{1}" in a

[Xdoclet-devel] Re: [Xdoclet-user] DocletContext.edc

2002-06-05 Thread aslak.hellesoy
The CVS XDoclet doesn't write any temp files to disk anymore. You're discussing a non-existant problem ;-) Aslak - Original Message - From: Hani Suleiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, June 4, 2002 11:01 pm Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] DocletContext.edc > Why not use File.createTemp

[Xdoclet-devel] [ xdoclet-Patches-564932 ] EJB inheritance

2002-06-05 Thread noreply
Patches item #564932, was opened at 2002-06-05 10:10 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=564932&group_id=31602 Category: xdoclet Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/

[Xdoclet-devel] [ xdoclet-Patches-565145 ] EJB inheritance + interface support

2002-06-05 Thread noreply
Patches item #565145, was opened at 2002-06-05 20:22 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=565145&group_id=31602 Category: xdoclet Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/

[Xdoclet-devel] [ xdoclet-Patches-565144 ] EJB Inheritance + Interface support

2002-06-05 Thread noreply
Patches item #565144, was opened at 2002-06-05 20:20 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=565144&group_id=31602 Category: xdoclet Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/

[Xdoclet-devel] [ xdoclet-Patches-565177 ] Interface generation

2002-06-05 Thread noreply
Patches item #565177, was opened at 2002-06-06 08:41 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=565177&group_id=31602 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Aslak Hellesøy (rinkrank) Assigned to: Aslak Hell