I just realised - there haven't been any tracker updates for bug items on
the list since April, just for feature requests and patches. Was there some
reason for this, or can I switch them back on? (I'd been filtering them into
a separate mailbox to help with updating changes.txt, now I'll have
I got the following error messages:
[ejbdoclet] Error parsing test.ejb.cmr.CountryLocal:Encountered "" at
line
15, column 2.
[ejbdoclet] Was expecting one of:
[ejbdoclet] "abstract" ...
[ejbdoclet] "boolean" ...
[ejbdoclet] "byte" ...
[ejbdoclet] "char" ...
[ejbdoclet] "class"
The code still has references in the documentation to the (unused)
TYPE_SUPERCLASS. Can I remove this from the code?
Mathias
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:04:15
Modified:core/src/xdoclet/loader XDocletXmlParserTest.java
Log:
Get the test working again.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2 xdoclet/core/src/xdoclet/loader/XDocletXmlParserTest.java
Index: XDocletXmlParserTest.java
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:04:18
Added: core/test/src xdoclet-xmlparsertest.xml
Log:
Get the test working again.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 xdoclet/core/test/src/xdoclet-xmlparsertest.xml
Index: xdoclet-xmlparsertest.xml
I guess so if it ain't used. I have never understood what it's for.
About the broken build, also see my mail earlier today.
Aslak
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mathias
> Bogaert
> Sent: 9. juli 2002 14:50
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:07:11
Modified:core/test build.xml
Log:
Fixed dist dir location. We should rewrite this build script, or even relocate the
tests.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +1 -1 xdoclet/core/test/build.xml
Index: build.xml
=
There are also problems with the XJavaDoc testsuite (junit), and the XDoclet
testsuite is totally broken.
The documentation is a little messy. Work needed here ;-)
I will see what I can do,
Mathias
-Original Message-
From: Aslak Hellesøy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: dinsdag 9 juli 2
Dear sir,
My name is mohan.Last four month i am try to get
ejx.jar file for deployment .
Can u plx send that deployment file to
me.
Thanking you
with regards
mohan
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 06:21:29
Modified:modules/apache/src/xdoclet/modules/apache/struts/resources
struts_config_xml.xdt
Log:
Fixed bug causing duplicate parameter attributes
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +1 -1
xdoclet/modules/apach
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:23:15
Modified:lib log4j.jar
Log:
Updated to log4j 1.2.5.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +905 -447 xdoclet/lib/log4j.jar
<>
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:28:09
Modified:xdocs/stylesheets site.vsl
Log:
Xtree css.
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +1 -0 xdoclet/xdocs/stylesheets/site.vsl
Index: site.vsl
===
RCS file:
Man,
you should have told us before. Here it is:
Aslak
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
mohanSent: 9. juli 2002 15:15To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] plx
send deployment tool
Dear sir,
My name is mo
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:41:26
Removed: docs build.xml index.html toc.html
Log:
Obsolete.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:41:53
xdoclet/xdocs/dtds - New directory
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Xdoclet-
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:42:40
Removed: docs/dtds xtags.dtd
Log:
Moved to xdocs.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:42:09
Added: xdocs/dtds xtags.dtd
Log:
Moved from docs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 xdoclet/xdocs/dtds/xtags.dtd
Index: xtags.dtd
===
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:49:15
xdoclet/xdocs/ide - New directory
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Xdoclet-d
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:49:20
xdoclet/xdocs/ide/idea - New directory
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Xdoc
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:50:06
Added: xdocs/ide/idea xdoclet.xml
Log:
Moved from docs to xdocs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 xdoclet/xdocs/ide/idea/xdoclet.xml
Index: xdoclet.xml
==
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:50:08
Removed: docs/ide index.html
Log:
Moved from docs to xdocs.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:50:06
Removed: docs/ide/idea xdoclet.xml
Log:
Moved from docs to xdocs.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:50:06
Added: xdocs/ide index.xml
Log:
Moved from docs to xdocs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 xdoclet/xdocs/ide/index.xml
Index: index.xml
===
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:56:39
Removed: docs/info downloadsources.html merge.html
Log:
Moved content to xdocs.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff, things, and much much more.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
User: pathoss
Date: 02/07/09 06:56:39
Modified:xdocsdownload.xml
Added: xdocsmerge.xml
Log:
Moved content to xdocs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +12 -0 xdoclet/xdocs/download.xml
Index: download.xml
==
--- Aslak_Hellesoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Konstantin Priblouda
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: 9. juli 2002 11:22
> > To: Aslak_Hellesoy
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] xtags DTD
> >
> >
> >
> > > > Yeah, I spotted that one (tag-param), b
The JBoss DTDs are no longer online at
"http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/X.dtd"; and this causes an exception at
deploy time on JBoss 3.0RC3
It seems like JBossSubTask.java needs a dtdDirectory property to set the
location of the DTDs. If no one has started to work on this already I can do
it
Patches item #578858, was opened at 2002-07-08 15:45
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=578858&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Cantrell (melquiades)
Assigned to: Nob
User: ara_e_w
Date: 02/07/09 12:33:22
Modified:samples/src/java/test/ejb AddressBean.java
Log:
- fixes the "method-params-not-fully-qualifiedin ejb-jar.xml" bug
- make the ejb:finder signature full qualified in samples
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -2 xdoclet
User: ara_e_w
Date: 02/07/09 12:33:22
Modified:core/src/xdoclet/tagshandler MethodTagsHandler.java
ParameterTagsHandler.java
Log:
- fixes the "method-params-not-fully-qualifiedin ejb-jar.xml" bug
- make the ejb:finder signature full qualified in samples
Feature Requests item #578989, was opened at 2002-07-09 16:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402707&aid=578989&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Ferguson (williamferguson)
Assigned to: Nob
Patches item #579172, was opened at 2002-07-09 11:44
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=579172&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Newcomb (mnewcomb)
Assigned to: Nob
Patches item #578858, was opened at 2002-07-08 15:45
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=578858&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 6
Submitted By: Paul Cantrell (melquiades)
Assigned to: No
Feature Requests item #578937, was opened at 2002-07-09 10:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402707&aid=578937&group_id=31602
Category: ejbdoclet
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: William Ferguson (williamferguson)
Assigned to: Nob
Patches item #579236, was opened at 2002-07-09 13:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=579236&group_id=31602
Category: other
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Newcomb (mnewcomb)
Assigned to: Nobody/
Patches item #579252, was opened at 2002-07-09 14:11
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402706&aid=579252&group_id=31602
Category: xdoclet
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michael Newcomb (mnewcomb)
Assigned to: Nobod
A wise old hermit known only as Philippe Caya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once
said:
> The JBoss DTDs are no longer online at
> "http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/X.dtd"; and this causes an exception
> at deploy time on JBoss 3.0RC3
RC3? What about the final released version?
Besides, why should we
I'm not a big fan of semi-coding in xml. So I prefer a different
approach:
Instead of all those nested/sibling condition/etc change it to a more
abstract thing. Introduce a tag. By default it actually
maps to ConditionBasedValidator which reads all those
elements and works based on those nested
A wise old hermit known only as =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aslak_Helles=F8y?=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> Man, you should have told us before. Here it is:
Now that's cruel. You'll go straight to hell for that one ;-)
Andrew.
---
This sf.net emai
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew
> Stevens
> Sent: 9. juli 2002 23:12
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] plx send deployment tool
>
>
> A wise old hermit known only as =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aslak_Helles=F8y?=
> <[
User: ara_e_w
Date: 02/07/09 15:19:59
Modified:samples build.xml
Log:
fixes the null param type problem (needs more investigation)
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +17 -21xdoclet/samples/build.xml
Index: build.xml
==
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:01:42
Modified:test Hello.java
Log:
Fixed the null problem that's been bugging us lately and showed up in compilation of
samples
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -0 xjavadoc/test/Hello.java
Index: Hello.java
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:01:42
Modified:src/xjavadoc AbstractClass.java SourceClass.java
UnknownClass.java Util.java XJavaDoc.java
XJavaDocTest.java
Log:
Fixed the null problem that's been bugging us lately and showed up in com
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:06:59
Modified:core/src/xdoclet/tagshandler ParameterTagsHandler.java
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:00
Modified:modules/apache/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corr
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:00
Modified:modules/caucho/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corr
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:00
Modified:modules/bea/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresp
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:06:59
Modified:.build.properties
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresponding co
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:02
Modified:modules/exolab/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corr
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:02
Modified:modules/hp/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the correspo
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:02
Modified:modules/jboss/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corre
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:02
Modified:modules/macromedia/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:03
Modified:modules modules-common.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresponding
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:03
Modified:modules/orion/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corre
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:01
Modified:modules/ejb/src/xdoclet/modules/ejb/entity
PersistentTagsHandler.java
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. T
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:03
Modified:modules/mvcsoft/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the cor
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:02
Modified:modules/ibm/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresp
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:03
Modified:modules/mx4j/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corres
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:04
Modified:modules/xdoclet/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the cor
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:04
Modified:modules/web/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresp
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:04
Modified:modules/webwork/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the cor
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:05
Added: xdocs/stylesheets xtags2html.vsl
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the correspon
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:04
Modified:modules/pramati/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the cor
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:00
Modified:modules/ejb/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresp
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:04
Modified:xdocs/dtds xtags.dtd
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresponding conditi
User: rinkrank
Date: 02/07/09 18:07:02
Modified:modules/jmx/src/META-INF xtags.xml
Log:
Improved tag docs. They now say at what level (class, method, field, constructor) a
tag belongs. This involves a change in xtags.dtd. There is a new tag which
more or less replaces the corresp
66 matches
Mail list logo
