Good day.
I mentioned SNAPSHOT but it doesn't need to - a timestamp version
will do, and I believe is by far more secure. I was thinking of using
http://xdoclet-plugins.sourceforge.net/maven/commons-jelly/jars/ to upload
them (there are some last week tests..) - timestamp builds - with svn HEAD
versions. (I used that /maven instead of existing /repository because of
directory attributes :( - I couldn't create new dirs there ..)
Answering Anatol, I've worked with Paul Libbrecht regarding Jelly
namespaces support - We can now generate xml descriptors (and others with
schema definition - and validation is supported GRA-2 (..)); A new xml tag
was added named "replaceNamespaces" also used there.
As Jelly uses now a tag caching scheme, I fixed
/xdoclet-plugins/xdoclet-plugins/plugin-web/src/main/java/org/xdoclet/plugin
/web/jelly/ConditionalElementTag.java to reset it's state at every run.
Diogo
Refs:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-213
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-214
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRA-2
-----------------------------------
Diogo Bacelar Quintela
EF - Tecnologias de Informação, Lda.
Av. António Serpa, 26 - 4º Dto.
1050-027 Lisboa, Portugal
Tel: (+351) 217 827 800
Fax: (+351) 217 827 830
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: 0xF51A5AB9
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Konstantin Priblouda
> Sent: sábado, 13 de Agosto de 2005 16:00
> To: xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [xdoclet-plugins-interest] New Jelly Version
>
>
>
> --- "Diogo Quintela (EF)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Devs
> >
> > I am about to commit some changes regarding the
> > jelly version
> > required - commons-jelly and commons-jelly-xml.
> > I've successfully built the project with that
> > version, so I should
> > not generate any problems.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
>
> I'm strongly opposed to everything
> commons-jelly-*-SNAPSHOT - it took a load of work to
> eliminate all the snapshot jelly dependencies, as they
>
> provide a huge potential of incompatibilities between
> each oher ( and also maven... ) - unless you provide a
> good ground for it.
>
> Why do you need this?
>
> regards,
>
> ----[ Konstantin Pribluda http://www.pribluda.de ]----------------
> Still using XDoclet 1.x? XDoclet 2 is released and of production quality.
> check it out: http://xdoclet.codehaus.org
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle
> Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list
> xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
xdoclet-plugins-interest mailing list
xdoclet-plugins-interest@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-plugins-interest
