Try
http://www.junitee.org/
Michel
"Chris Butler"
is it marked with the appropriate persistence markers?
Why don't you paste in the @tag markup and the method declarations. it
could be something as simple as a typo.
- Original Message -
From: "Nathaniel Rahav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: We
No, I'm sorry, scratch that. I'm still having the problem.
My ValueObject does indeed have a getPersonUId and setPersonUId method,
generated by xdoclet.
But my PersonCMP does not set the UId when it instantiates a value object
to return back to the calling method.
That is, my PersonCMP whic
Hey,
I've looked a little more closely at the generated Value Object and I see
my problem... it exposes the primary key with the methods
getPrimaryKey
and
setPrimaryKey
but not with the field as it's named in my object ("getPersonUId()")
thanx tho
Nat
..
.From: "Ada
The easiest way is to set your XDOCLET_HOME as you did your JAVA_HOME then you
can add this to your build.xml file
...
Richard
Acir Resende wrote:
> I´m using xdoclet-bin-1.2b2 and I can´t compile the
> samples. The outcome from Ant is:
>
> "BUILD FAILED file:C:/xdoclet/samples/build.xml:41
The best reference implimentation for Xdoclet is xpetstore :
http://xpetstore.sourceforge.net/
Working code is always the best documentation.
Regards
Richard
Sean Garagan wrote:
> Good day,
>
> We are trying to implement a read-mostly pattern with XDoclet 1.1.2 for
> Weblogic and JBoss. This
I´m using xdoclet-bin-1.2b2 and I can´t compile the
samples. The outcome from Ant is:
"BUILD FAILED file:C:/xdoclet/samples/build.xml:41:
taskdef class xdoclet.DocletTask cannot be found"
It seems that Ant can´t find the xdoclet classes.
Can you help me?
Thanks
Acir
_
On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 14:35, Dave Steinbrunn wrote:
> I'm trying to use the webdoclet task to generate my war and some jsp
> taglibs. When I run my ant task to do this, I get the following error:
>
> neutron--> ant -buildfile build2.xml
> Buildfile: build2.xml
>
> war:
> [webdoclet] Make sure
Good day,
We are trying to implement a read-mostly pattern with XDoclet 1.1.2 for
Weblogic and JBoss. This seems to be causing problems in that finders
from the RO beans are being pushed into the RW home interface. Are
there examples somewhere to show how to do this?
Thanks,
Sean
-
Hi,
I've got a session bean method, which calls create() on three different
entity EJB's, and as such inserts three tuples in the DB...
Now I'd like these three calls to be part of one and the same
transaction, so that, if e.g. the second call fails, the database would
be unchanged...
I thought
Maybe I’m just daft here, but what’s the easiest
way to use Junit to do local Util Object testing?
In particular I want to do something like:
SomeObjectLocalHome lhome = SomeObjectUtil.getLocalHome();
Also I’ve noticed that junitejb.sourceforge.net seems
to have disappeared…
I th
> The vendor extension elements should end up in different places with field
> and collection tags. If not, can you demonstrate just what happens?
Ok, I see the motivation now. For the extensions I'm using, they go inside
the block. So the @jdo.field-vendor-extension tag is all
that is needed.
Hi,
> You don't need a extra bean for the mapping.
> In the example I sent you, the mapping between
> person and drink in m:n.
>
> Have a look at
> * @jboss.relation-mapping
> style="relation-table"
> * @jboss.relation-table
> table-name="Drink_Person_rel"
> * create-table="true"
Hello,
I'm switching from doing my Java dev on linux to Mac OSX. I also just
recently started using xdoclet to generate my ejb's and web
applications, which worked great on linux. However, I'm running into
some problems running the same build files on my new mac.
First, the problem:
I'm
Hi,
> From: Ionel GARDAIS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I have designed my database with a table for managing
> M:N relationship.
>
> My question is :
> do I need to create a bean for this "relationship only
> table" or do the tags added to the relation beans are
> enought for Xdoclet/JBoss to use
The vendor extension elements should end up in different places with field
and collection tags. If not, can you demonstrate just what happens?
thanks
david jencks
On 2003.03.05 08:16 Michael Mattox wrote:
> I build the latest version from CVS and I'm using it now. I noticed this
> in
> the samp
I build the latest version from CVS and I'm using it now. I noticed this in
the samples:
/**
* @jdo.field
* collection-type="collection"
* embedded-element="false"
* element-type="test.jdo.SuperChild"
* default-fetch-group="true"
* @jdo.collection
Hi,
Thanks to Heiko Rupp, I've been able to handle 1:N
relationship.
I have designed my database with a table for managing
M:N relationship.
My question is :
do I need to create a bean for this "relationship only
table" or do the tags added to the relation beans are
enought for Xdoclet/JBoss to
Hi,
> Can you
> post the relevant bits of your build script, and the
> VO-related tags
> from one of your CMP beans?
from build.xml :
from a bean :
- Class le
Thanks Aslak
- Original Message -
From: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] XDOCLET 2.0 when??
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf O
20 matches
Mail list logo
