Re: [Xdoclet-user] Xdoclet tags for WebSphere

2004-11-29 Thread Magnus Larsson
Hello Hansika! Yes for sure! Please see my posting in this maillist on "2004-11-15 08:38" with the subject "Update of the IBM WebSphere module available with support for WebSphere v5.x and v6.0". ÂSince the update is not part of the current XDoclet release (1.2.2) I have Âuploaded the jar-fil

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Brian Topping
Hello Jose, Yes, things are coming along rather nicely on this side of the fence. I've had no major problems with XDoclet for several months and decided that it was a good time to get things in shape so others could take advantage of it. Getting started with it is not hard at all, and you don

[Xdoclet-user] Problem With Generated File Being Appended

2004-11-29 Thread Kevin Hinners
I have a custom template that I am using to generate a class file. The ant task is: When I modify the source file, triggering the xdoclet task to run, the results are appended to the existing destination file. I need this file to be overwritte

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Jose Gonzalez Gomez
Konstantin Priblouda wrote: --- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Well, there's nothing wrong... I don't know if you know anything about Gentoo Linux, but in case you don't, it's a source based linux "metadistribution". They have a technology called portage that automatically downlo

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Well, there's nothing wrong... I don't know if > you know anything > about Gentoo Linux, but in case you don't, it's a > source based linux > "metadistribution". They have a technology called > portage that > automatically downloads the sou

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Jose Gonzalez Gomez
Konstantin Priblouda wrote: Well, I'm currently using Gentoo Linux and I was thinking about the possibility of doing an ebuild (script used by portage to install packages). Currently they're trying to enforce installation of Java packages always compiled from source, and that's why I was sear

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
> Well, I'm currently using Gentoo Linux and I was > thinking about the > possibility of doing an ebuild (script used by > portage to install > packages). Currently they're trying to enforce > installation of Java > packages always compiled from source, and that's why > I was searching for

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Jose Gonzalez Gomez
Konstantin Priblouda wrote: --- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A final question... is there any way to get a source tarball of a given xdoclet2 release without downloading it from the CVS repository? At the moment no. I think you do not grok it fully. You will not need sour

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > A final question... is there any way to get a > source tarball of a > given xdoclet2 release without downloading it from > the CVS repository? At the moment no. I think you do not grok it fully. You will not need sources of xdoclet itself - i

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Jose Gonzalez Gomez
Konstantin Priblouda wrote: --- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Konstantin Priblouda wrote: --- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry about my ignorance, but I guess if Maven takes care of the download, it must be in some Maven repository. I've been

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Konstantin Priblouda wrote: > > >--- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >wrote: > > > > > >>Any > >>way, there is no > >>information in the web about status of the > project, > >>expected release > >>dates, downloadable source or bi

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Jose Gonzalez Gomez
Konstantin Priblouda wrote: --- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any way, there is no information in the web about status of the project, expected release dates, downloadable source or binary tarballs or anything like that... 2.0 is released and is in codehaus repository. J

[Xdoclet-user] Xdoclet tags for WebSphere

2004-11-29 Thread Purbhoo, Hansika
Title: Xdoclet tags for WebSphere Hi All I'm just wondering whether there is anyone out there who has successfully managed to use Xdoclet tags for Websphere ... I have been battling for a few days to get things up and running, and am now on the verge of giving up and using the Assembly Toolkit

Re: [Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Konstantin Priblouda
--- Jose Gonzalez Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > Recently I came across > http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/ and found that > XDoclet2 seems to be in a rather usable state. Yes , it is. > Any > way, there is no > information in the web about status of the project, >

[Xdoclet-user] XDoclet2 status

2004-11-29 Thread Jose Gonzalez Gomez
Hi there, Recently I came across http://xdoclet.codehaus.org/ and found that XDoclet2 seems to be in a rather usable state. Any way, there is no information in the web about status of the project, expected release dates, downloadable source or binary tarballs or anything like that... what