Re: [Xdoclet-user] Add relation or persistent member accessor tothe public interface

2003-08-18 Thread Jean-philippe VIGNIEL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think I understand what you're asking, and the answer is "no" -- @ejb.persistence has nothing to do with putting methods into your remote/local interfaces. It is used to tell the container what column to map the attribute to. Here's an example: /** * @ejb.interface-

Re: [Xdoclet-user] Add relation or persistent member accessor tothe public interface

2003-08-14 Thread Jean-philippe VIGNIEL
Thanks for your answer. I think i've not correcltly explained what i want to do. I would like to add persistent members accessors of an entity bean to its interface. I've already tried to add the ejb.interface-method to a persistent member definition, but it doesn't work. Indeed, if I write th

Re: [Xdoclet-user] Add relation or persistent member accessor tothe public interface

2003-08-14 Thread Andrew Stevens
On Wed, 2003-08-13 at 10:48, Jean-philippe VIGNIEL wrote: > i want to write > > class ABean{ > > /** > /* @ejb.persistence > /* > **/ > public abstract String getId(); >public abstract void setId(String id); > } > > and have as result > > interface A { > Strin

Re: [Xdoclet-user] Add relation or persistent member accessor tothe public interface

2003-08-14 Thread Jean-philippe VIGNIEL
I'm not sure you've really understood my problem (i'm not sure it was clearly explained :)) Generating a method by adding the @ejb.interface works fine. On the other hand all methods tagged by @ejb.persistence or @ejb.relation are not added to the interfaces. I guess it's the default behavior