RE: [Xdoclet-user] strutsvalidatorxml for commons-validator

2003-11-26 Thread Mark Lybarger
> -Original Message- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 4:11 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] strutsvalidatorxml for commons-validator > > > On Tuesday, November 25, 2003, at 02:02

Re: [Xdoclet-user] strutsvalidatorxml for commons-validator

2003-11-26 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Tuesday, November 25, 2003, at 02:02 PM, Mark Lybarger wrote: Great. I also added support for java.util.Date since that seemed to be out, via: static { supportedTypes.add("java.lang.String"); supportedTypes.add("java.lang.Integer"); supportedTypes.add("int");

RE: [Xdoclet-user] strutsvalidatorxml for commons-validator

2003-11-25 Thread Mark Lybarger
----- > From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 1:24 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] strutsvalidatorxml for commons-validator > > > Yes, this seems like the right approach. I don't have time to really > d

Re: [Xdoclet-user] strutsvalidatorxml for commons-validator

2003-11-25 Thread Erik Hatcher
Yes, this seems like the right approach. I don't have time to really dig under the covers to see what else is needed, but as long as you don't break the Struts Validator piece of this then all is fine with me. :) I don't think a switch on the subtask is needed, but maybe to keep processing

[Xdoclet-user] strutsvalidatorxml for commons-validator

2003-11-25 Thread Mark Lybarger
I was able to get the strutsvalidatorxml to work with commons-validator by making the following change in the StrutsValidatorTagsHandler class. Probably a "better" way to do this is to add a parameter to the strutsvalidationxml task such as : Then checking that property (if possible) in