, but what is the difference in terms of what gets
> generated by XDoclet?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Steve Knight'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTEC
It makes sense I think. It will be for later though ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of Marcus Brito
> Sent: vendredi 1 mars 2002 23:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Aggregate DataO
Em Qui, 2002-02-28 às 14:45, Vincent Harcq escreveu:
> Customer Bean have
> * @ejb:value-object name="CustomerLight" match="light"
> * @ejb:value-object name="CustomerNormal" match="normal"
> instantiation="eager"
> * @ejb:value-object name="Customer" match="*"
Perhaps it would be better so s
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Steve Knight'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Aggregate DataObjects
Does your related beans (the tagged ones) are in the sourcepath of
I need theem :)
Vinc
nt.execute(UnknownElement.java:104)
is what makes me think this.
Thanks again,
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Steve Knight'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002
OTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Aggregate DataObjects
>
>
> Vincent,
> I am having problems using 1-n value objects.
> fails whenever it tries to generate the CMP for
> a bean with a 1-n value object defined:
>
> Running
> Generating CMP class for '
- Original Message -
From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Steve Knight'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 2:13 PM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Aggregate DataObjects
The diff are on th
IL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-user] Aggregate DataObjects
>
>
> Thanks for the explanation, Vincent.
> I am now using value objects and so far so good.
> I understand the difference between Aggregation and
> Composition, but what is the difference in t
Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Steve Knight'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Aggregate DataObjects
OK
You need subtask
AddressBean have @ejb:value-object name="Addre
as written with CMP 1.1 in mind,
so more work will be needed for sure.
This covers more than Data Object but I am listening to any improvements
that could be added...
Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
>
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:12 AM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-user] Aggregate DataObjects
> Aggregation on _DataObjects_ works only for 1-1 relationship.
> For 1-n, you may want to look at _ValueObject_ (only in cvs a
Aggregation on _DataObjects_ works only for 1-1 relationship.
For 1-n, you may want to look at _ValueObject_ (only in cvs and not
fully tested). It is a kind of _DataObject_ but more sophiticated. We
introduced there 1-n relationships (as well as multiple VO per entity
bean with bean's attribut
Hi,
I'm
also interested in knowing more about this. From what I understand is you can
put an ejb:aggregate task in the javadocs for a method: eg. for public abstract
Collection getAddresses() in a person entity bean and then I would get a method
in my person value object as follows: public
13 matches
Mail list logo
