Re: [Xdoclet-user] One-to-Many CMR

2003-08-14 Thread Milen Dyankov
Rupp, Heiko wrote: Have a look at http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/tags/[EMAIL PROTECTED](0..1) Yes I have read that. I have tried "target-multiple" attribute but XDoclet seems to ignore it. and the valueobject docment http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/valueobjects.html Well, I don't see why should I

Re: [Xdoclet-user] One-to-Many CMR

2003-08-14 Thread Milen Dyankov
Andy, thanks a lot for opening my eyes. I'm new to XDoclet and I'm still learning it. Stupid me, should have thought of that. It's so obvious. 10x again. Milen Andy Jefferson wrote: Is it possible to define one-to-many CMR using XDoclet. Yes, as the other responder said. I have dictionary bean:

RE: [Xdoclet-user] One-to-Many CMR

2003-08-14 Thread Rupp, Heiko
> Is it possible to define one-to-many CMR using XDoclet. Yes. > (which in my opinion is correct). But how can I specify that I want > one-to-many. I could'n find the answer for that in XDoclet > documentation. Have a look at http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/tags/[EMAIL PROTECTED](0..1) and the

RE: [Xdoclet-user] One-to-Many CMR

2003-08-14 Thread Harkness, David
Others have already pointed out that yes you can do 1:N relationships and that you need to tag the Collection and FooLocal accessors. Here's a sample if you need further assistance. User (id) <-- 1:N --> Phone (userId) UserEJB.java___ /** *

Re: [Xdoclet-user] One-to-Many CMR

2003-08-14 Thread Andy Jefferson
> Is it possible to define one-to-many CMR using XDoclet. Yes, as the other responder said. > I have dictionary bean: > > =={JAVA CODE} > /** > * @ejb.bean > * name = "Dictionary" > * type = "CMP" > * cmp-version = "2