On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:14:14AM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
> > I think MA Young already has an Xen 4.2 RPM - so the functionality
> >for that is there. It is just the matter of compiling it with a
> >GCC compiler that can do PE.
>
> I got it t
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 12:50 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> I contacted the people behind the the Fedora Seure Boot feature and got
> the following responses, from Peter Jones:
>
Wow, cool, thanks a lot!
> Okay, to be honest I don't remember much about Xen's layout - dom0 is the
> management kernel th
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:45:02PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 12:50 +0100, M A Young wrote:
> > I contacted the people behind the the Fedora Seure Boot feature and got
> > the following responses, from Peter Jones:
> >
> Wow, cool, thanks a lot!
>
> > Okay, to be honest
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:33 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > The only thing that comes to my mind is PCI passthrough, as it probably
> > could be thought at something allowing physical memory accesses... Or is
> > the control Xen/qemu provides over it sufficient? (Again, I think the
> > same
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:45:02PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 12:50 +0100, M A Young wrote:
I contacted the people behind the the Fedora Seure Boot feature and got
the following responses, from Peter Jones:
Wow, cool,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:55:19PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 11:33 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > The only thing that comes to my mind is PCI passthrough, as it probably
> > > could be thought at something allowing physical memory accesses... Or is
> > > the co
