gument in favour of
dom0 in F15 natively. As a user though, I would be absolutely thrilled
to see this happen.
I've been working on tutorials meant to introduce Xen's use in Red Hat
clusters, and I would be more that happy to donate or adapt it to help
the cause.
--
Digimer
E-Mail
tock
4.0.1 hypervisor on one machine, and can use the stock KVM/QEMU setup
for another.
Assuming all is fine, would it matter whether the VMs were F14 vs CentOS
5.5?
I was thinking 3x runs each of;
- bonnie++
- Recompile Michael's kernel
- ?? Please make suggestions
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi.
On 10-11-09 12:54 PM, j...@destar.net wrote:
> Digimer,
>
> I would think the latest xen vs the latest kvm would be best. Fully
> virtualized vs Para-virtualized, is that possible with kvm? I don't
> believe your specs are too low end, they actually match pretty close
&g
; living lives of quiet desperation, hoping beyond hope that one call goes
> their
> way, of having one branch to grab onto.
>
> Dearest Santa - please don't leave these desperate souls a lump of KVM in
> their stocking.
>
> Thank you and god bless us every one!
This
ml
One thing I can say already, I've been unable to get Fedora 14 to start
as a KVM VM with more than one CPU. I'm having to rework my test bed to
use RHEL 6.0 now that it's out and hope that it solves the problem. :)
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
--
xen mailing list
xen@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
. I'll need a bit
more time now to setup a RHEL 6 based platform (host and guests). I'm
still hoping to get most done this weekend, but I make no promises. If
not, I'll aim for the weekend after to finish.
Cheers
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: ht
in the main Red Hat
repository (at least, not that I could find). I was wondering what,
exactly, needs asciidoc and if it would be safe/easy/possible/advisable
to remove that dependency.
Thanks!
1.
http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.32.25-172.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm
--
Dig
On 11/17/2010 03:06 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>
>> The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
>> repository (at least, not that I could find). I was wondering what,
>> exactly, needs asciido
On 11/17/2010 03:06 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>
>> The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red Hat
>> repository (at least, not that I could find). I was wondering what,
>> exactly, needs asciido
On 11/17/2010 03:27 PM, M A Young wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 11/17/2010 03:06 PM, M A Young wrote:
>>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Digimer wrote:
>>>
>>>> The source RPM depends on 'asciidoc', which isn't in the main Red
On 11/12/2010 10:58 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 10-11-12 09:57 AM, Todd Deshane wrote:
>> There is also an ongoing discussion about Xen vs. KVM performance on
>> the CentOS virt list
>>
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2010-October/002074.html
>
> The
and installed this and your latest 2.6.32 (174) kernel today.
In both cases, on boot at the point where it should scrub the RAM, my
system reboots.
My '/' partition is encrypted (ext4), perhaps this is the cause? If not,
what could I do to help trace the problem?
Thanks!
--
Digim
On 11/30/2010 05:40 PM, Digimer wrote:
> On 11/22/2010 07:28 PM, M A Young wrote:
>> Here is an rc3 kernel (2.6.37-0.rc3.git0.1.xendom0.fc15) at
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2617730
>>
>> It updates to the latest next-2.6.37 pat
elp narrow down the potential
source of the problem?
Thanks for the continued hard work. :)
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
--
xen mailing list
xen@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
ILD/xen-4.0.2/tools'
make: *** [install-tools] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hwk0rB (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.hwk0rB (%build)
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin
On 01/11/2011 03:33 AM, M A Young wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2011, Digimer wrote:
>
>> I just tried this kernel on Fedora 14 x86_64 and, like several of the
>> previous attempts, it simply reboots after xen.gz finishes booting (at
>> least, this is what I can guess, as the s
, a huge improvement. :D I'll try
provisioning a couple domUs for further testing.
Thanks for the hard work, it really is appreciated!
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
--
xen mailing list
xen@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen
On 02/02/2011 11:02 PM, Digimer wrote:
> First blush (no domUs yet)
> - dom0 boots with >2GB RAM
> - dom0 boots with encrypted root partition.
> - CPU frequency scaling /doesn't/ work (Intel Core2Duo P9400)
> - There seems to be a UI lag somewhere. Windows and key-presses
On 02/03/2011 08:28 AM, Digimer wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 11:02 PM, Digimer wrote:
>> First blush (no domUs yet)
>> - dom0 boots with >2GB RAM
>> - dom0 boots with encrypted root partition.
>> - CPU frequency scaling /doesn't/ work (Intel Core2Duo P9400)
>&g
On 02/03/2011 10:04 AM, M A Young wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 02/03/2011 08:28 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2011 11:02 PM, Digimer wrote:
>>> Another note; When I tried to sleep the machine, it hung. Screen went
>>> dark and the p
On 02/03/2011 10:04 AM, M A Young wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Digimer wrote:
>
>> On 02/03/2011 08:28 AM, Digimer wrote:
>>> On 02/02/2011 11:02 PM, Digimer wrote:
>>> Another note; When I tried to sleep the machine, it hung. Screen went
>>> dark and the p
On 02/03/2011 10:10 AM, Digimer wrote:
>> Try with kernel-2.6.38-0.rc3.git0.1.fc15 at
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=216558 (the latest
>> regular rawhide kernel, though a later was is currently being built).
>> If that shows the same behaviour you
ernel components,
> but they did not make the Fedora 15 timeline.
Personally speaking, I'd rather wait for things to be done right. All
involved, please keep up the good work. It's appreciated and Xen in F16
will be anticipated. :)
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepape
23 matches
Mail list logo
