I have built a new kernel (kernel-2.6.32.21-168.xendom0.fc12) at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2477887 or at the
repository http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/myoung/dom0-kernel/
It includes fixes for the recent x86_64 local root exploit.
There are also some new builds of x
On 09/24/2010 06:02 PM, M A Young wrote:
> I have built a new kernel (kernel-2.6.32.21-168.xendom0.fc12) at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2477887 or at the
> repositoryhttp://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/myoung/dom0-kernel/
> It includes fixes for the recent x86_64 local roo
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> I'm trying these two under f13, and not getting past udev starting on the
> pv_ops kernel. (Xen oops) The non-xen kernel works fine on this hardware. A
> pv_ops version from back around January was working well for me, but I wanted
> to grab the x86
> On Sat, 25 Sep 2010, Bill McGonigle wrote:
>
>> I'm trying these two under f13, and not getting past udev starting on the
>> pv_ops kernel. (Xen oops) The non-xen kernel works fine on this hardware.
>> A pv_ops version from back around January was working well for me, but I
>> wanted to grab
Quick question:
Should the libvirt stuff be updated?
Sep 27 10:47:41 seanl64 libvirtd: 10:47:41.234: error : statsErrorFunc:60 :
internal error read_bd_stats: Failed to read any block statistics
libvirt-client-0.8.2-1.fc12.x86_64
libvirt-python-0.8.2-1.fc12.x86_64
libvirt-0.8.2-1.fc12.x86_64
x
Further to the previous email regarding diskio stats:
It appears the ksysguardd is no longer able to gather stats either.
I'm suspecting a bug in the kernel and not libvirtd.
Cheers
V
On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 08:02:00 am M A Young wrote:
> I have built a new kernel (kernel-2.6.32.21-168.xendom0.fc12
On 09/25/2010 09:48 AM, M A Young wrote:
> In your case it might be the only way to get the relevant information. I
> also have a computer without a serial port, and have tried other two
> things to get debugging information though they may not help in your case.
OK, after much futzing around,
On 09/25/2010 09:48 AM, M A Young wrote:
>
> In your case it might be the only way to get the relevant information.
OK, new backplate works like a charm, appending the serial log.
Now that the messages aren't mostly scrolled off the screen (can I get a better
VGA mode than 80x25 under Xen?), I
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:02:00PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> I have built a new kernel (kernel-2.6.32.21-168.xendom0.fc12) at
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2477887 or at the
> repository http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/myoung/dom0-kernel/
> It includes fixes for the rec
> Are you planning to get xen-4.0.1-3.fc14 to F14 before it goes GA?
> That would be good..
The most recent "yum update" installs xen-4.0.1-4.fc14 on F14 ( rawhide)
Boris.
--- On Sun, 10/3/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen
Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] xen and do
hide is currently F15.. F14 has been branched already.
But yeah, I re-checked, and I noticed xen-4.0.1-4.fc14.src.rpm
in F14 updates-testing.
So all fine.
Thanks!
-- Pasi
>Boris.
>
>--- On Sun, 10/3/10, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
> From: Pasi Kärkkäinen
> Sub
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Are you planning to get xen-4.0.1-3.fc14 to F14 before it goes GA?
That would be good..
There has been a bit of a delay because it got built with a bad gcc.
xen-4.0.1-4.fc14 is a rebuild once gcc was fixed. As specified in
https://fedoraproject.org/
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 08:55:15PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
>> Are you planning to get xen-4.0.1-3.fc14 to F14 before it goes GA?
>> That would be good..
>
> There has been a bit of a delay because it got built with a bad gcc.
> xen-4.0.1-4.fc14 is a
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, M A Young wrote:
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
There has been a bit of a delay because it got built with a bad gcc.
xen-4.0.1-4.fc14 is a rebuild once gcc was fixed. As specified in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
I am now waiting a week before
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 09:56:35PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, M A Young wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>
>> There has been a bit of a delay because it got built with a bad gcc.
>> xen-4.0.1-4.fc14 is a rebuild once gcc was fixed. As specified in
>> ht
15 matches
Mail list logo