Re: [Xen-devel] [v5][PATCH 0/4] xen: introduce new machine for IGD passthrough

2014-11-23 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:49:13PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: > v5: > > * Simplify to make sure its really inherited from the standard one in patch #3 > * Then drop the original patch #3 I carried i440fx: make types configurable at run-time pc_init1: pass parameters just with types

[Xen-devel] [qemu-upstream-unstable test] 31779: regressions - FAIL

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31779 qemu-upstream-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31779/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 31647 Tests whic

Re: [Xen-devel] Q77 IGD instantly crashes on xen-pciback bind.

2014-11-23 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:02:33PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: > On Nov 21, 2:57pm, "Dr. Greg Wettstein" wrote: > } Subject: [Xen-devel] Q77 IGD instantly crashes on xen-pciback bind. > > > Hi, hope the week is ending well for everyone. > > As I was walking out the door I remembered I had b

Re: [Xen-devel] Q77 IGD instantly crashes on xen-pciback bind.

2014-11-23 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 04:05:48PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:02:33PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2:57pm, "Dr. Greg Wettstein" wrote: > > } Subject: [Xen-devel] Q77 IGD instantly crashes on xen-pciback bind. > > > > > Hi, hope the week is ending

Re: [Xen-devel] Q77 IGD instantly crashes on xen-pciback bind.

2014-11-23 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 02:57:14PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote: > Hi, hope the week is ending well for everyone. > > As readers of the list may remember we've kept the ATI primary adapter > passthrough patches current for qemu-traditional on Xen for a number > of years. Our 'run-passthrough'

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 31787: regressions - FAIL

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31787 libvirt real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31787/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-libvirt 5 libvirt-build fail REGR. vs. 31680 Tests which did not succe

[Xen-devel] [seabios test] 31760: regressions - FAIL

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31760 seabios real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31760/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 31601 Regressions which are reg

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.4-testing test] 31781: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31781 xen-4.4-testing real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31781/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 1 build-check(1) blocked n/a test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64

[Xen-devel] [RFC v2] Add support for Xen ARM guest on FreeBSD

2014-11-23 Thread Julien Grall
Hello all, At the beginning of the year, I have sent a first RFC to add support for FreeBSD on Xen ARM [1]. The first version was very primitive: hardcoded DTB, only single user-mode support,... Since then, I have improved the support and rebased everything on master. Thanks for the FreeBS

Re: [Xen-devel] Problems using xl migrate

2014-11-23 Thread M A Young
On Sat, 22 Nov 2014, M A Young wrote: While investigating a bug reported on Red Hat Bugzilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166461 I discovered the following xl migrate --debug domid localhost does indeed fail for Xen 4.4 pv (the bug report is for Xen 4.3 hvm ) when xl migrate do

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 31795: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31795 linux-linus real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31795/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 8 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 31241 test-amd64-amd64-rump

Re: [Xen-devel] [v5][PATCH 0/4] xen: introduce new machine for IGD passthrough

2014-11-23 Thread Chen, Tiejun
On 2014/11/23 18:10, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:49:13PM +0800, Tiejun Chen wrote: v5: * Simplify to make sure its really inherited from the standard one in patch #3 * Then drop the original patch #3 I carried i440fx: make types configurable at run-time

[Xen-devel] virtio on Xen cannot work

2014-11-23 Thread Wen Congyang
When I try to use virtio on xen(HVM guest), qemu crashed. Here is the backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 0x7f49581f0b55 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #1 0x7f49581f2131 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #2 0x7f495af2af32 in xen_ram_addr_from_mapcache (ptr=0x7f4951858ac8) at /root/work/xen/to

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 31764: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31764 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31764/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-i386-pair17 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail like 31659 Tests which did not succeed,

[Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 31771: tolerable trouble: broken/fail/pass

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31771 linux-next real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31771/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 8 guest-start fail baseline untested test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 12

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 31801: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2014-11-23 Thread xen . org
flight 31801 qemu-mainline real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/31801/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 4 xen-install fail pass in 31768 test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 5 x

Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1

2014-11-23 Thread Hu, Robert
> -Original Message- > From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 8:39 PM > To: Hu, Robert; xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Cc: jbeul...@suse.com > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [TestDay] VMX test report for Xen 4.5.0-rc1 > > > On 11/12/2014 01:58

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen-pciback: drop SR-IOV VFs when PF driver unloads

2014-11-23 Thread Jan Beulich
>>> On 21.11.14 at 23:03, wrote: > I rewrote it a bit to be more in the style of pciback: >[...] > [v2: Removed the switch statement, moved it about] What you don't mention here is that you also removed the outer loop, yet that breaks functionality afaict: There can (and I suppose normally will)