On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:19 +, David Vrabel wrote:
On 04/03/15 14:09, Juergen Gross wrote:
The main question whether it is worth to consider this alternative is
the performance aspect. Does anyone have an idea which USB devices would
typically be used via pvusb? I'd suspect memory
On 03/04/2015 08:28 AM, Chun Yan Liu wrote:
On 3/4/2015 at 01:15 AM, in message 54f5ec4e.6020...@eu.citrix.com,
George
Dunlap george.dun...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On 01/19/2015 08:28 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote:
To attach a usb device, a virtual usb controller should be created first.
This
On 04/03/15 14:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 04.03.15 at 15:37, julien.gr...@linaro.org wrote:
I looked to the interface of XENDOMCTL_bind_pt_irq and I'm not sure
about the meaning of machine_irq and isa_irq.
AFAIU the code:
machine_irq = guest PIRQ
Yes (i.e. the Xen assigned
On 03/04/2015 09:43 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 02:31:51PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:06:50PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 03/03/2015 04:26 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 03:13:07PM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Juergen Gross wrote:
Do you have another feeling about the probability of a need to do usb 3?
If it is already on the horizon I wouldn't want to do the user space
backend now and the kernel one next year. :-)
One year is pretty long in kernel time.
//Peter
101 - 105 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
